My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-21-2005 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2005
>
11-21-2005 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2012 4:11:25 PM
Creation date
4/4/2012 4:11:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
` <br /> To: Chair Ralui and Platuiing Conunissioners <br /> Ron Moorse, City Adniinistrator <br /> City Couucil <br /> Tom Barrett <br /> John Sha�•cilow <br /> From: Mike Gaffron, Plainiing Director <br /> Date: November 1, 2005 <br /> Subject: Draft Zoning& Subdivision Code Amendments: Conservation Design <br /> Attached is the first draft, hot off the press, of an ordinance for implementing the <br /> Conservation Design principles established within the Orono Rural Oasis coinp plan <br /> amendment. Tlus draft has not been reviewed by DSU, and is merely my initial attempt <br /> to incorporate the variety of elements necessary to impleinent Conservation Design. <br /> Some sections need to be fleshed out a bit, but I have atteinpted to keep it relatively <br /> straightforward. Mtich of it comes directly fi•om DSU's suggested ordinance otrtline <br /> received last March. <br /> Please review the attached draft - your comments, questions, suggested additions or <br /> revisions, etc. are solicited. Pay particular attention to the Density Bonus Standards <br /> on Page 4 - we haven't spent any significant time discussing exactly how a density <br /> honus should be awarded. I've tried to relate it to our current 1/2-acre and 1-acre <br /> urban zoning standards, as well as to the future density ranges established in the <br /> 2000-2020 CMP for the few property areas reguided to allow higher densities. <br /> The language as initially drafted leaves it to the Council to establish just how much <br /> of a density bonus will be awarded for doing `site enhancement' actions beyond the <br /> basic Conservation Design requirements; but maybe this should be tightened up to <br /> make it more clear that, for instance, if a developer does X he gets density A; if he <br /> does X+Y, he gets densify A+B; if he does X+Y+Z, he gets density A+B+C... <br /> We have scheduled a public hearing for this ordinance amendment at the November 21 <br /> Plaiuung Commission meeting. It is also up for discussion at the Platuung Commission's <br /> November 2 work session. <br /> Please note that I an1 also in the process of assembling the documents, maps, etc. <br /> necessary for the Rural Oasis comp plan amendment submittal to Met Council. We <br /> anticipate that Met Council will find this amendment iion-controversial. <br /> Your comments, questions, suggested revisions and additions, are solicited. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.