Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#05-3136 <br /> 9 August 2005 <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br /> Structural Covera�e: <br /> Total Lot Area Total Structural Covera e <br /> 83,222 s.£ (1.9 acre) Allowed: 12,483 s.f. (15%) <br /> Pro osed: 6,282 s.f. (7.5 %) <br /> Hardcover Calculations: <br /> Hardcover Zone Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed <br /> Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover <br /> 0—75 527 s.f. 0 s.f 47 s.£* 60 s.f. <br /> (0%) (8.9%) (11.4%) <br /> 75—250 23,141 s.f. 5,785 s.f. 1,988 s.£* 2,903 s.f. <br /> (25%) (8.6%) (12.6%) <br /> 250—500 32,654 s.f. 9,796 s.f. 6,342 s.f.* 8,716 s.f. <br /> (30%) (19.4%) (26.7%) <br /> 500— 1000 26,211 s.f. 9,173 s.£ 248 s.f.* 9,153 s.f. <br /> (35%) (1.0%) (34.9%) <br /> * After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> Lot Width and Lot Area <br /> Required lot area and lot width for the LR-lA District are 2 acres and 200', and an <br /> existing sewered lot of record at least 1 acre in area and 100' in width is allowed to be <br /> residentially developed. In this case, the lot meets the required minimum standards of <br /> Section 78-72(b)(2). The lot's width is defined as 133' and area is 1.91 acres. <br /> Average Lakeshore Setback Variance <br /> The home to the west is located on a flag lot causing an unnatural average lakeshore <br /> setback line. The portion of the home within the average lakeshore setback area is 17' <br /> deep and is an approxiinate 170 s.f. triangle plus decks and patio area. The encroachment <br /> does not appear to have a negative affect on the property to the west, rather is an <br /> improvement to the current home location. Additionally, there is a hill on the neighbor's <br /> property which may or may not block lake views in the direction of the applicant's honle. <br /> Engineer Comments <br /> City Engineer, Tom Kellogg has not had an opportunity to review or comment on the <br /> applicant's revised plans. Based on comments received regarding the originally <br /> submitted plans the engineer reconunended revisions including side yard swales in order <br /> to contain the storm water on the property, revisions to the proposed retaining walls <br /> regarding setbacks and an engineered design, and a relocation of the existing driveway to <br /> access Heritage Drive rather than County Road 15. <br /> Hardship Statement <br /> Applicant has completed the IIardship Documentation Form aitached as �xhibit B, and <br /> should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br /> 4 <br />