Laserfiche WebLink
+,�, <br /> Page 1 of 3 <br /> - 4 � <br /> HARDSHIP DOCUMENTATION F�RM ��� <br /> h�=� <br /> This form.is a required submittal for all variance applications. An appiication` <br /> # wiii noi be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is <br /> complete and submitted to the City. " <br /> Minnesota State Statue Section 394.27, Subdivision 7 requires that a hardship be <br /> demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The hardship must be unique to#he <br /> property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic <br /> situations are'not considered valid hardships. In ordec for an application to be heard by <br /> the Planning Commission and City Council a hardship having merit must be <br /> demonstrated, - <br /> HOW DO 1 PROVE A HARDSHIP? � <br /> This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if a hardship <br /> exists and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove a hardship, <br /> address all'the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible. <br /> Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of_proving that the <br /> variance is Nstified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a <br /> denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered. <br /> Please address each of these hardship criteria as they relate to the request (some may <br /> not applY)� <br /> 1. `'The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br /> conditions allowed by the o�cial controls." <br /> This proposal does not require a variance from city code other than minimum <br /> _ acreage and lot _ <br /> 2. "The pliqht of the landowner is due to circumstances uniaue to his propertv not <br /> created by the landowner:" � <br /> The landowner has purchased an existin lot but has no ability to increase the size <br /> of the property. <br /> 3. "The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the focalitv:" <br /> . The character of the localitv will not be altered by this proposal <br /> � <br /> 4. "Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an' undue yhardship if <br /> .�:�sonabie use tor the nroperty exists under the terms of the 2oning Chapter." <br /> Economic considerations have no a�fect on whether this proposal vrould �r'�;r;^c:',�' <br /> not pass the existina zonin reau!?���;�-y <br /> �i� i J �,� �:� � � f:1 . * :, •t <br /> � j.k,.��G,. ���} �.�.f! yr� t'�; �.�,? I � �,5� 'i <br /> ! a�� � ,..' i j Lr �'� r�rr 1 <br /> �d�r;,:F:� ;. t � - �", �r.�" I <br /> �.„• <br /> , ,, <br /> � � ,� �.� 5��� � <br /> � �tis q,X=k+7�ht <br /> 1 <br />