Laserfiche WebLink
#OS-3095 <br /> July 14,2005 <br /> Page 3 <br /> Both permanent and seasonal docks fall under the zoning category of accessory structures,and one <br /> camiot have a pernianent or seasonal dock without a principal residence structure. The properiy does <br /> contain a principal residence. <br /> There are no specific Building Code construction standards for docks. The City will require that a <br /> building permit be issued to document the existence and construction of the permanent dock. <br /> Wetland Dock Standards <br /> The draft Wetland Ordinance allows as a permitted use within a wetiand, docks for "reasonable <br /> access to the lake",with the intent that lakeshore properties with lake perimeter wetlands should be <br /> allowed a dock to open water for boating and other lake recreation uses. This dock would appear to <br /> meet that intent. Staff notes that this is a secondary dock for the property,with a primary seasonal <br /> dock located an the inain part of Crystal Bay. <br /> The proposed dock width of 6' through the wetland is wider than the 4' dock that would be allowed <br /> by the draft Ordinance. Planniiig Commission should deternune whether a hardship exists that <br /> would support the 6' width. If so,is that a hardship that would apply to all similar docks?If that is <br /> the case, should the ordinance be re-drafted to allow 6' docks generally? <br /> Wetland Buffer Requirement <br /> Section 78-1601(c)(1)of the draft Wetland Ordinance indicates that wetland buffers will be required <br /> when a wetland is altered. Staff is reviewing whether the construction of a perinanent dock in a <br /> wetland should be considered as a wetland alteration. If so,in this case the inlpact would be(tu�der <br /> the draft ordinance) that a buffer of 35' width would have to be established and maintained on <br /> applicants property abutting the wetland(see draft Wetland Ordinance for more detail on buffers). <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> Because the wetland moratorium is still in effect,the City cannot grant fuial approval for this dock. <br /> However, it may serve the applicant and the City to review the request in ternls of the Floodplain <br /> CUP,and with regards to appro�riateness of the draft ordinance standards for docks withul wetlands. <br />