My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-18-2005 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2005
>
07-18-2005 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2012 12:16:29 PM
Creation date
4/4/2012 12:16:08 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
-, MINUTES OF TI3� ,`D� 0 <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION M�ETING � � <br /> Monci1y,Ji�ne 20,2005 ,,/!�// <br /> 6:00 o'clock P.m. �f� �� I,� <br /> . "� �r /' <br /> Gaffion noted there are seveca] easements affecting how the applicants can use tlris property. An ingress .� <br /> and egress easement exists to provide access From Shoreline Drive lo the City-owned plrlcing lot. This <br /> exists along the eastern 7.5 leet of the properly, and while not enccoached upon by 1ny oF lhe proposed <br /> improvements, ils fiuictionllity may be impacted by the lcitchen addition as proposed. In addition, a <br /> highway elsemenl approximaYely ten feet wide exists along the front lot line. This easement is in favor of <br /> IIennepin County 1nd will not be encroach.ed upon by any of the proposed improvements. An ldditional <br /> easement for sidewallc purposes approxii��ately 4.5 feet wide exists along the north side of the highway <br /> elsement and is in favor of the City. The edge of this easement is about two feet from tlle front wall of <br /> the building and is encroached upon by the existing roof overhang. An undergrotuid utility and electric <br /> distribution easement also exist. <br /> Gaffron indicated the applicants are not proposing any ldditional sign�ge. With the proposed expansion <br /> into the remainder of the building, the applicant would no�v be pennitted 112 square feet of total signage <br /> wid11 single sign not to exceed 50 square feet. <br /> Gaffron noted the applicant has not indicated on the plans that any new lighting is proposed. The lighting <br /> in the City-o�vned parlting lot will reinain unchanged; however, the applicanl should be asked to address <br /> whether any new lighting will be proposed for the outdoor seating�reas. <br /> Gaffron stated the 2000 condition�l use permil rec�uired lhe followiGib: <br /> 1. The appliclnl shall instlll�two-door system at the rear entrance to meet a(1 State Building and <br /> I'ire Code stanci�rcts. The purpose of the doors would be to allow eustomers to enter�ncl exit the bt7ilding <br /> without allowinb noise to lelve tl�e builcting. They should be spaced so one door woiild close belore the <br /> , <br /> second door is opened. All doors shall remain closed at all liules, e;ccept�vhen entering or':ex��ling�the <br /> building. __." <br /> ,i <br /> 2. Live entert�inment will end al 12:30 a.m. each niglll 111CI lll2 51100(1 SI11I1 CIOSe 1t I:OO S.1]]. z£lCll <br /> Il l�t*,jl l. <br /> PAGL 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.