Laserfiche WebLink
� - MINUTES OT TAE �G' <br /> . � O <br /> ORONO PLANIVING COMMISSTON NIEETING � <br /> Monday,June 20,2005 ,� <br /> 6:00 o'clocic p.m. �� S' <br /> .r ��, <br /> 5. Front ylyd building setback vari�nce to permil a front yard setback of 9' when 35' is normally <br /> required and 16' currently exists to allow construction of 1 vestibufe. Tlie vestibule adciition�vould <br /> encroach 4.5' onto the sidewallc easement and have a 0' setback from the highway easemenl). <br /> 6. Front and rear yard vlriances would be required as 1 fcont yard of 20' is normally required 1nd an <br /> unobstructed rear yard of 30' is norinally required where proposed vestibule aiid planter bo�ces would <br /> encroach on these yard cequireinents. <br /> Gaffron stated the applicants are pro�osing to construct a 13' by 16' kitchen addition to the norlheast <br /> corner of the building. Tlle eastern side lot line requires a .15-foot setbacic where the existing building and <br /> the proposed addition 1re only 8.2 feet fcom the lot line. The kitchen addition would Ue sotely located on <br /> the applicant's property where it would not encroach on any of the many easements currently restricting <br /> the property in some way. The property consists of.31 acres or 13,656 square feet where a minimunz lot <br /> area oi'a�proximately 20,000 square Feet is required. Gaffron noted this is an existing lot of record and <br /> lot area is not an issue. Gaffron stated l�ardcover on the site is virti.ially 100 percent and would normally <br /> be allowed 35 percent. Gaffron staled the applicants are not proposing any change to the hardcover <br /> eYCept for possibly incorporlting some small green areas in the front. The applic�ints are proposing <br /> increasing the stntchiral coverage on this lot fi•om 35 percent to 38 percent. <br /> Gaifron stated a kitchen addition al this location would reduce the existing 25.5 foot wall-to-�vall <br /> separation between the corner service station and the Narro�vs building to just uncler 21 feet,flC�C�lllg tQ 1 <br /> more conbested sihiation both visually aucl from a traffic standpoint. The access driveway easement <br /> corridor into the City parlcing lot al this location is 15 feet wide, �vithin 0.7' oi'the existing Narrows <br /> builciing and within foLir feet of the service station. Given th�t the access driveway has a Uend in it just <br /> north of lhc Narcows builcling, furlher restcictions by a kitchen expansion in this �ire would be <br /> inappropriate. One option to consider would be to offset the kitchen adctition at lelst fve feet�vestward <br /> alon,�-rlie�,l"L'Il S1CL8 Of CII�vUI�Cllil�50 1:I111'tlle VlSl11I �ll1G�tLl�1Ct10111I COI1StCiClIOriS 1Ce llll(llllll'LI;C��I1CI l�l� <br /> (Ost, <br /> se��1ra�� bel�een the Narro�vs and the service station does not decrelse. <br /> _.�/ <br /> Pf1G� 31 <br />