Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
#OS-3102 920 Bro�vn Rd.S. <br /> May 12,2005 <br /> • Page 3 <br /> Structural Coverl�e: <br /> Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage <br /> 40,400 s.f. (0.93 ac.) Allowed: 6,060s.f. (15.0 %) <br /> Initial Proposal: 3,463 s.f. (8.6 %) <br /> Revised Plan: 3,714 s.f (9.2 %) <br /> _ _ _ _ _. <br /> IIardcover Calculatioiis: <br /> Hardcover Total Area Allowed Existing Revised <br /> Zone in Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover <br /> 0-75' 3,220 s.f. 0% (to be removed) 0 s.f. (0%) <br /> 75-250' 21,825 s.f, 5,456 s.f, (25 %) (to be removed) 2,498 s.f. (11.4 %) <br /> 250-500' 15,340 s.f. 4,602 s.f. (30%) (to be removed) 4,294 s.f. (28.0 %) <br /> Totals 40,385 s.f. 10,058 sf (to be removed) 6,792 s.f. <br /> Hardship Statement & Analysis <br /> (Refer to conunents froin April 14 Memo) <br /> Summ�ry of Issues for Consideration <br /> l. Is tl�e existing lot size sufficient hardship to support granting of the lot area and width <br /> variances? <br /> 2. Are there hardskiips present that support granting of the side setback variances? Is the <br /> 50' wide buildable envelope so limiting as to be considered a hardship? <br /> 3. Would granting of the north side setback variauce of 12' be appropriate in tl�e context <br /> of this neigllborhood and the locations of neighUoring homes? Is the iinpact of <br /> additional structure length while requiring less side setback encroachiizent, a positive <br /> or iiegative for the neighborhood? <br /> 4. Are there auy other issues with tliis proposed reUuild? <br />