My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 2604
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 2600 - 2699 (March 13, 1989 - September 11, 1989)
>
Resolution 2604
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2019 11:17:18 AM
Creation date
7/6/2016 1:13:44 PM
Metadata
Document Relationships
480 Tonkawa Rd (NO PID)
(Attachment)
Path:
\Property Files\Street Address\T\Tonkawa Rd
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�_ � ' <br /> � . � Cit� of ORONO <br /> • �� _ , , �.� <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> :^ � _ <br /> � .t NO. 2604 <br /> .• � • •rr <br /> A) The proposed walkway structure is necessary to provide <br /> reasonable access to the usable lakeshore without forcing the <br /> property owner to cross the neighboring property. <br /> B) The structure will maintain a low profile and is not intended <br /> to have a railing. <br /> C) The 6' width, while 2' in excess of the 4' width normally <br /> allowed for such structures, is necessary for the safety of the <br /> users of such structure, considering the extremely long 175' <br /> length of this walkway. � <br /> D) The structure at a 6' platform width comprises 1.8� hardcover <br /> in the 0-75' setback zone. There is no hardcover existing or <br /> proposed in the 75-250' zone. The proposed walkway will have no <br /> significant impact on run-off quantity or quality. <br /> • 6. The City Council has reviewed the facts of the application and the <br /> Planning Commission recommendation, and finds that the proposed 6' <br /> platform width is excessive, and that a 4' wide walkway platform will <br /> provide for adequate user safety while minimizing the impact of <br /> hardcover in the 0-75' zone. Furthermore, although the applicant <br /> wishes to avoid railings where possible, railings should be allowed <br /> for safety purposes at any location on the structure where railings <br /> are required by the Building Code. <br /> 7. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this <br /> property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other <br /> �roperty in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not <br /> adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard <br /> or other danger to neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a <br /> substantial property right of the app licant; and would be in keeping <br /> with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan <br /> of the City. <br /> 8. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to <br /> al low the construction of the proposed walkway with a platform width <br /> not exceeding 4' would not be detrimental to the health, safety or <br /> general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air <br /> nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor <br /> • wil 1 it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposea <br /> level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and <br /> objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.