My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-23-2002 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
09-23-2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2012 3:36:39 PM
Creation date
3/30/2012 3:36:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 23, 2002 <br />• 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />( #02 -2813 MARK WELCH, Continued) <br />Jeanne Welch stated that he did own both sides and up into the hill, however, they had no <br />desire to build a retaining wall into the hill. She presented hardcover figures to support <br />their redevelopment. <br />Weinberger noted that it is the site plan that gets approved and the eave overhang does <br />not count into the hardcover equation. <br />Mr. Welch explained that the roofline cantilevers back into the home and the base <br />footings. The living space is considered hardcover, but not the eave overhang. <br />Jeanne Welch continued by pointing out that the current width of the street varies, and <br />even if the home were to be shifted toward the road it would still not go past where the <br />first garage is. She added that the Lyndale Cedar Home was ordered for delivery this <br />Thursday based on discussion that took place at the August Planning Commission <br />meeting in which they were told the proposal would be acceptable if the home were <br />shifted back toward the road. <br />Murphy questioned what forced them to change the face of the home. <br />• Jeanne Welch indicated that they changed the flat front to a row in order to capture <br />P p <br />better views and 65 s.f of additional living space. <br />While he had no problem with the proposed windows and prow, Nygard questioned why <br />they would propose to move the home back toward the street when the natural character <br />of the neighborhood would be to keep it in line with the current average lakeshore <br />setback. Since the backside has such tight limitations, he believed the City should <br />establish an average lakeshore setback line to which this neighborhood should adhere. <br />Sansevere asked staff why this proposal would not be a good idea. <br />Gaffron indicated that since the DNR standard setback is 50', the Planning Commission <br />was trying to obtain the 50' setback, but there is nothing that says the City Council <br />cannot change that setback number. He stated that if the home were shifted toward the <br />lake, there would be more hardcover in the 0 -75' setback zone. <br />Nygard suggested they move in that direction, if staff had no objection. <br />Gaffron reminded the Council that whatever is approved for this application will set the <br />standard for the entire block, in fact, he pointed out that the adjacent neighbor is waiting <br />to submit his plans based on what is decided here. <br />0 <br />Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.