My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-23-2002 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
09-23-2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2012 3:36:39 PM
Creation date
3/30/2012 3:36:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 23, 2002 • <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />( #02 -2813 MARK WELCH, Continued) <br />Murphy asked the applicant why they went ahead and ordered the kit for delivery without <br />final approval and asked if the Planning Commission knew they had done so. <br />Mabusth stated that the Planning Commission did not know that the applicant had <br />ordered their materials. She indicated that, perhaps, the Planning Commission had chosen <br />the wrong wording when they told the applicant to shift the home back, they should have <br />spelled it out, but assumed the applicant would redesign the home to fit within the <br />parameters of the setbacks. <br />Jeanne Welch stated that after shifting the home back as they were told in August, it was <br />not until September that the parameters were truly spelled out. By that time, they had <br />ordered the kit to meet the deadlines they needed to meet with the manufacturer in order <br />to beat the snow. <br />Weinberger indicated that he had had a conversation with Mr. Welch on the phone and <br />advised Mr. Welch to not order the house without Council approval even though staff <br />was aware of their time constraints. <br />Murphy stated that they should have waited since nothing is a done deal until the City • <br />Council makes its ruling. <br />White asked what the City Council would consider as the most important setback in this <br />situation. It seemed obvious to him that they could not meet both the front and rear <br />setbacks, and construct a home of any size. He urged the Council to be reasonable, the <br />home was merely 1,300 s.f., under the 1,500 s.f. lot coverage maximum. White <br />maintained that if it is the front lakeside line that is most important, the Council needs to <br />be willing to give on the backside, or vice versa. <br />Nygard stated that the precedent that he liked being set here was the 1,300 s.f. home, a <br />reasonable sized home for the lot. It fits within the City ordinance. <br />Mr. Welch indicated that the cedar home would be a beautiful post and beam cottage <br />style home. It would be very cute for the lot and hopefully set a precedent for the <br />character of the neighborhood. <br />Weinberger agreed that the home was not a big house for the site. <br />Sansevere asked for Gappa to give his opinion. <br />Gappa stated that he felt the most important line to hold would be the back street side <br />setback. • <br />Page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.