Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, AUGUST 12, 2002 <br />• 7. #02 -2793 Revis Stephenson, 1850 Fox Ridge Road—After-the-Fact Variance and <br />CUP Resolution No. 4844 — Continued <br />Galatz also stated that Mr. Stephenson had called him 2 weeks ago and he gave him <br />written requests on behalf of Mr. Chalfen that have not been met. Galatz stated he was <br />offended by Stephenson's lack of regard for the directives of the City. <br />Sansevere asked where Mr. Chalfen has been and why Stephenson and Chalfen did not <br />speak directly. Galatz stated that he directed Stephenson to go through him, and that <br />Chalfen had spoken to Stephenson back in January. <br />Murphy stated that in Galatz's letter of August 2, 2002, under item 4, he requested the <br />planting of sugar maples, that fill soil composition be analyzed and amended as necessary, <br />4" of topsoil be placed over the current grade, and a letter of credit or other security is <br />provided to insure the landscaping is finished in a timely fashion. Murphy stated he <br />agreed with the above listed terms, though he did not agree with Galatz's suggestion that <br />Stephenson be required to cut back the slope. He suggesting approving the application as <br />is with the above noted requirements added. <br />Murphy moved, and White seconded, to adopt a resolution granting an after - the -fact <br />• conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 to <br />permit land alteration and fill of beyond the 3,280 s.f. of material that was approved <br />in 2001 and an after -the -fact variance to permit land alteration within 26' of the <br />wetland with the requirements of: the planting of sugar maples, that fill soil <br />composition be analyzed and amended as necessary, 4" of topsoil over the current <br />grade, and a letter of credit or other security to insure the landscaping is finished in <br />a timely fashion. <br />0 <br />Nygard stated that he disagreed with requiring residents to put up 150% of the project cost <br />as security. Gaffron stated it is common practice with developers, but not with residents. <br />Stephenson stated that the City was holding a cashier's check for $5000 as security <br />against road damage that has no expiration date. He volunteered that check as security <br />against the landscaping. <br />Galatz stated that his tree experts claim trees need 5 years to take, and Stephenson should <br />provide security for 5 years against death of the trees he plants. <br />Stephenson stated that Chalfen seems to believe he has a claim to the trees on <br />Stephenson's property, which he does not. He has offered to do extra plantings on the <br />property side nearest Chalfen. He stated the trees could not be planted too densely as it <br />would inhibit mature growth. <br />15 <br />