Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, AUGUST 12, 2002 <br />7. #02 -2793 Revis Stephenson, 1850 Fox Ridge Road—After-the-Fact Variance and • <br />CUP — Resolution No. 4844 <br />Acting Mayor Sansevere stated that, because the application had been before Council <br />several times already, they should only address new or currently relevant points. <br />Gaffron stated that the application had returned with a planting plan. The City Landscape <br />designer felt comfortable with the trees and the plan, and the plantings provided an <br />appropriate mix for the area. The total impact on the wetland was about 300 s.f., much <br />less than initially believed, based on new analysis by Peterson Environmental. <br />Gaffron stated that Weinberger's memo suggested Council could: <br />1. Approve the application as is, which would involve extensive tree planting and would <br />not require fill be hauled away from the site. Also, existing vegetation would not be <br />destroyed. The result would be somewhat inconsistent with the ordinances that protect the <br />wetland buffer areas, and the finished slope would be steeper than 3:1. <br />2. Approve an amendment to the CUP and not variances, which would require removal of <br />any fill that has been added within 26' of the wetland. A portion of the hillside would <br />need to be regarded and fill removed from the site. <br />3. Deny the application and require the finished grades to match the approvals • <br />the original CUP. <br />�' pp granted in <br />Revis Stephenson stated that he was comfortable with the resolution approving the plan as <br />is. He felt the landscape plan was extensive and protected the buffer zone and wetland. <br />Eric Galatz, attorney representing Mr. Chalfen at 350 South Brown Road, presented a 10' <br />tall tree and stated that it represented the size of tree Mr. Stephenson would be planting. <br />He said that his client felt the trees were completely inadequate. <br />Sansevere asked Gaffron if the City was comfortable with the tree size proposed by <br />Stephenson. Gaffron stated that a tree with a 2" diameter was appropriate because a larger <br />tree would require major machinery to get it planted into the slope. Also, smaller trees <br />take root more quickly than larger ones and will thrive sooner after the transplant. 1 %" – <br />2" diameter trees would be appropriate. <br />Galatz stated that he had brought with him Frank Svoboda, a wetland ecologist, and <br />Kathryn Ryan, a landscape architect. The trees on the plan were shown at 35' apart, <br />which they felt was too far. He stated the plan could not have had serious review and that <br />Weinberger stated in his memo that the slope was still too steep and asked for 2 -3" <br />diameter trees. He claimed that Mr. Stephenson had buried trees and brush under the new <br />fill and they would rot, creating air pockets and uneven settling. • <br />14 <br />