Laserfiche WebLink
#04-3010 <br /> August 16,2004 <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br /> - 26.2' —house .11' <br /> Riglit Side (south) 10' 73' —detached (10' was previously <br /> garage pro osed) <br /> , 88' <br /> Lakeshore 75' 9g,5' —shede (previously 90' — <br /> house ) <br /> Average Lalceshore �1.5' —98.5' (goinj 110' —94' 83'� <br /> north to south) (conforming) (94 previously) <br /> Structural Covera e <br /> Total Lot Area Total Structur�l Coverage <br /> 21,926 s.f. (0.�0 acres) Allowed: 3,2�9 s.f. (15%) <br /> Proposetl: 3,128 s.f. (14.3%) <br /> Previously Pro osed: 3,208 s.£ (14.6%) <br /> Hardcover Calculations <br /> (A typo was made on the on tl�e previous report regarding the square footages in each <br /> zone, however this typo did not affect the hardcover levels proposed. It is now <br /> corrected.) <br /> Hardcovei• Total Area in Allo�ved Existing Proposed <br /> Zone Zone Hardcovei• Hardcover Hardcover <br /> 0—75 7,698 s.f. 0 s.f 320 s.�.* 0 s.f. <br /> � (0%) (4%} (0%) <br /> 4,306 s.f. <br /> (30%) <br /> 75 —250 14 228 s.f. 3,557 s.f, 7,032 s.f.* previous: <br /> ' (25%) (49%) 4,676 s.f. <br /> (32.86%) <br /> * After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds; ii�.cludes substantial gravel <br /> driveways never approved by the City. <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. Should this conforming lot be granted a hardcover variance? <br /> 2. What level of ground disturbance should be allowed within the 0-75' lalce yard? <br /> 3. Should the applicant be encouraged to reduce the footpriizt of the house, which is <br /> currently proposed at 2,288 square feet, not including the garage even though the <br /> strLictural coverage requiremei�t is met? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Staff recoininends denial of the hardcover variance and conditional use permit request. <br /> The applicant should be encouraged to reduce the size of the house and/or garage. <br /> Staff also recoinmends denial of the coizditional use permit request as currei�.tly <br /> presented. Following a site visit fioin the City Engineer the applicant will be directed to <br /> an alternative solution for restoring the slope located between the 934 and 944 elevations. <br />