Laserfiche WebLink
#04-3010 <br /> March 21,2005 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> � I�� past applications the Plaiuling Conmiission has made a distinction between an <br /> additioi�/remodel verses a rebuild based on how much of the existing stntcture would <br /> remain, with 50%typically the tlueshold. When a project is deenled an additioi�/remodel, <br /> the Plamiing Conunission and Council expects no increases in hardcover, however when <br /> the site is grossly over the allowed hardcover allowances, decreases in hardcover are <br /> expected. When the project is deenled a rebuild, the applicant is expected to meet all <br /> existing Zoning Ordinance requirements regardless of existing site characteristics. This <br /> distinction between addition/remodel and rebuild must be made basecl on the new plans <br /> submitted by the applicant. Staff will provide recommendltion for both scenarios. <br /> Revised Hardcover Calculations <br /> (Items in bold/itr�lics re resent the current roposal) <br /> Hardcover Total Are1 iu Allowed Existing Proposed <br /> Zone Zone H�rdcover Hardcover Hardcover <br /> 345 s.f. <br /> 0 s.f 320 s.f. (4.4%) <br /> 0—75 7,767 s.f. (0%) �4%� lst&2nd <br /> Proposal: <br /> 0 s.f. (0%) <br /> 4,608 s.f. <br /> (32.S%) <br /> 2"d Proposal: <br /> 75 —250 14,159 s.f. 3,540 s.f. 7,032 s.f. 4,306 s.f. <br /> (25%) (49%) (30%) <br /> ls`Proposal: <br /> 4,676 s.f. <br /> (32.86%) <br /> Revised Structural Coverage <br /> (Iteins in bold/italics re resent the cui-rent proposal) <br /> Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage <br /> 21,926 s.f. (0.50 acres) Allowed: 3,289 s.f. (15%) <br /> Existing: 1,584 s.f. (7.2%) <br /> Revise�l Proposal: 2,634 s.f. (12%) <br /> 2na ploposal: 3,128 s.f. (14.3%) <br /> ls�Proposal: 3,208 s.f. (14.6%) <br /> Hardship <br /> Based on the revised application and how previous renovation projects have �Ueen <br /> reviewed, there may be a hardship to warraiit � hardcover variance only if the applicant is <br /> given credit for the 3,588 s.f. of gravel located within the 75'-250' zone. This gravel was <br /> added without pei7niis and not suUject to atry review process, as is the case for most <br /> driveway hardcover in the City. If this gravel were taken out of the hardcover <br /> calculations, the property would be conforn�ing iii tl�e 75'-250' zone at 24%. With the <br /> proposed additioi�/remodel, the applicant is requesting that this gravel area be tradable for <br />