Laserfiche WebLink
#OS-3075 <br /> � Januury 18,2005 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> � Right Side 10' 41' No Further <br /> Encroachment <br /> Lakeshore 75' �p� No Further <br /> Encroachment <br /> All of property <br /> Average Lakeshore except 15' from 70' Encroachment No Further <br /> street Encroachment <br /> Structural Covera e <br /> Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage <br /> 46,148 s.f. (1.06 acre) Allowed: 6,922 s.f. (15%) <br /> Proposed: 2,743 s.f. (6%) <br /> Hardcover Calculations <br /> Hardcover Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed <br /> Zone Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover <br /> 0—75 32,877 s.f. 0% (2.6%) * No Change <br /> 75 —250 3,318 s.f. 4,192 s.f.* 4,830 s.f. <br /> 13,271 s.f. (25% 31.6%) (35.9%) <br /> * After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined la.ndscape beds <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> Average Lakeshore Setback Variance <br /> The property is subject to the average lakeshore setback requirements due to its adjacent <br /> neighbor's also having lakeshore properties. However,the applicant's property is located <br /> on a point which results in the entire structure lying within the defined average lakeshore <br /> setback. This requires variance approval. <br /> Hardcover Variance <br /> The existing property contains 4,192 s.f. of hardcover within the 75'-250' zone. Zoning <br /> Ordinance section 78-1288 (b) requires that the 75'-250' zone contain no more than 25% <br /> hardcover. This project proposes constntction of an additiona1638 s.f. of hardcover or an <br /> additional 4.3%requires hardcover variance review. <br /> Hardship Statement <br /> Applicant has provided a brief hardship statement in Exhibit B, and should be asked for <br /> additional testimony regarding the application. <br /> Hardshi Anal sis <br /> Ir1 caiesidering applicatio�rs for variance,t/�e Plaru�ii�g Co�ninissio��s/tall consider the effect of t/�e <br /> proposed variaiice upo�r t/ie l�ealtf�, safety aiid welfare of the community,existiirg af�d a�tticipated <br /> traffic co�:ditioirs,liglit and air, da�rger of fire,risk to tlte public safeh�,and tlle effect on valires of <br /> property in tlie surrou�iding area. Tlte Plan�iing Conrmissiofi s1:aU co�rsider reconimending approval <br /> for variances from tlte literal provisio�rs of tlre Zo�ring Code ire instances ivhere their strict <br /> enforcement►ti�ould cause und�re hardsleip becnuse of cii•cu»rstances iuiique to the iildiridrral <br /> property iutder coitsideration, Rrrd sliall recoirune�id approval o�ily►vl:en it is den�aistrated that srrcl� <br /> actiores wi/d be iic keepi�tg ivith tl�e spirit a�td iretent of the Orono Zonin�Code. <br />