Laserfiche WebLink
#04-2987 <br /> March I5,2004 <br /> - Page 7 of 7 <br /> 4. The owner is proposing to keep the existing caretaker house which is assumed to <br /> have kitchen facilities. A fourth septic site must be located and a setback variance <br /> would be required. <br /> 5. Proposed lot 6 may access off Fox Street. Is the P1aruling Conunission okay with <br /> 2 accesses off Fox Street where there is currently only one? Would an outlot <br /> across proposed lot 5 be a inore acceptable sohrtion if proposed lot 5 could meet <br /> the 2.0 acres standard,not inchiding the outlot? <br /> 6. Is there a bluff on proposed lot 6? What issues does this raise for the septic sites <br /> shown? <br /> 7. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Summary <br /> The goal of this review is to provide the developer with an overview of the pertinent City <br /> orduiances and how tliey affect the proposed plat, and to discuss the streilgths and <br /> weaknesses of the proposal. The above "Issues for Discussion"reveal a uumber of issues <br /> with the proposed plat and shottld provide direction to the applicants regarding the plat. <br /> During the sketch plan review, tl�e developer should advise whether any of the issues <br /> noted present particular problems, so that those issues can be discussed and the potential <br /> for approval or deilial of variasices to code standards can be addressed by tl�e Planning <br /> Commission. Planning Commission should review each topic and identify any issues to <br /> wliich the developer should pay special attention. <br />