01-18-2005 Planning Commission Packet

Home Browse Search

#04-2987 � March 15,2004 ' Page 3 of 7 Lot 2— This lot is shown as 2.914 acres of dry and 27.76 total acres. This lot will gain access off the cul-de-sac portion of the private road. This lot as currently oriented creates soine design challenges as a small portion of buildable area exists at the street end as well as the 929.4' end, however are not contiguous when the 100' lake setback far structures is taken into consideration. Access to the proposed hoine location will require a driveway to hug the lot line to meet the 75' hardcover restriction. Septic I�ispector, Matt Bolterman has also determined that the proposed sites do not meet the required 20' setback to the home. Construction of a home in tlus lot meeting all setback, hardcover, aud septic restrictions will be difficult. The ideal layout would be combination of proposed lot 2 and lot 3. Lot 3 — The lot is shown as 2.04 acres of dry and 5.40 acres total. Tlus lot will also front the proposed private roadway at the cul-de-sac and have approximately 380' of frontage at the 929.4' elevation. This lot appears very buildable assuming the amount of dry acreage is correct and the formal septic reports are favorable. Lot 4— This lot is shown at 2.86 acres of dry and 2.98 acres total. The lot will have approximately 600 feet of frontage of the proposed private road with only a few feet of frontage at the 929.4' elevation. The Subdivision Ordinance would require that the driveway access extend off the straight section of the private road and not the cul-de-sac portion. The topography appears challenging, however the lot appears buildable with respect to setback, septic and hardcover . standards. Lot 5 — This lot is shown at 2.13 acres dry and 2.30 acres total. This lot would not have any frontage at the 929.4' elevation and would be considered a corner, non- lakeshore lot. Access would be required from the southerly end of the proposed private road frontage. This lot appears very buildable as currently laid out. Staff's only concern with this lot is the existing access along the southerly lot line to the existing house further east. Should the applicants wish to keep the existing drive access to the existing house, a private easement must be pursued. The other option is to require that it be placed in an outlot. With either the easeinent option or the outlot option, the area devoted to the driveway access cannot be counted towards the 2.0 acre area requirement under the Subdivision Ordinance definition of `lot area'. With the existing access, therefore, the lot would not meet the minimum standard for area. Lot 6— The lot is shown as approximately 5.17 acres of dry and 7.60 acres total. The existing house is proposed to reinain as well as the gliest l�ouse. Wetlands exist to the northeast with a setback of 26' shown. A�proximately 400 feet of frontage at the 929.4' elevation is shown with all stnicture setbacks far the existing house easily rnet.