My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/15/2004 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
11/15/2004 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2012 11:07:00 AM
Creation date
3/9/2012 11:07:00 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,November 15,2004 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#04-3069 G&L LAND INVESTMENTS, CONTINUED) <br /> Jurgens suggested that perhaps this application be tabled to allow the applicant time to submit final <br /> grading plans. <br /> Gundlach pointed out the applicants have not submitted final plans for the house. The applicants have <br /> indicated to Staff that the pool would not be any higher than the existing deck. <br /> Fritzler stated if this is not the final plan and the pool is not in the exact location it would be built in,he <br /> would prefer to table the application. Fritzler indicated he has the same concerns as Jurgens. <br /> Bremer inquired whether there could be a stipulation on the maximum elevation of the pool. <br /> Gundlach concurred that the height of the pool could be stipulated. Gundlach stated the applicants have <br /> not indicated that the location of the pool would change if the plans for the house change. Gundlach <br /> indicated the applicants are attempting to achieve a bigger driveway and have not indicated that the <br /> location of the pool would change. <br /> Leslie stated the concern he has with this application has to do with the likelihood of a fence being <br /> constructed around the pool and the extent to which that fence may obstruct the view of neighboring <br /> properties. Leslie noted that point has not been addressed in the proposal. <br /> Gundlach stated Orono's Code does not require a pool to be fenced in,but noted that some insurance <br /> companies do require a fence. <br /> Bremer stated the Planning Commission could indicate a non-privacy type fence such as a rod iron fence <br /> would be okay. <br /> Winkey stated he also would prefer to have a final plan. <br /> Jurgens moved,Kempf seconded,to table Application#04-3069, G&L Land Investments, <br /> LLC,2665 Mapleridge Lane,to allow the applicant time to submit plans depicting final elevations of <br /> the pool and house and the amount of fill that would be required. VOTE: Ayes 7,Nays 0. <br /> NEW BUSINESS <br /> #04-3022 PHILIP AND KAREN SKOOG,280 TONKA AVENUE—VARIANCES,6:31 p.m.— <br /> 6:35 p.m. <br /> Philip Skoog,Applicant, is present. <br /> PAGE 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.