Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,November 15,2004 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#04-3052 ERIC VOGSTROM, CONTINUED) <br /> Kempf stated the applicant has indicated the proposed hardcover does include hardcover for a driveway <br /> that would now be located on the lot rather than in the fire lane,which results in a reduction in the amount <br /> of total hardcover for this lot. Kempf stated the hardcover that is currently in the fire lane would not <br /> factor into what will be built on this lot. <br /> Rahn noted the hardcover that currently exists on this lot does not include a driveway. <br /> Kempf stated what happens in the fire lane does not factor into the amount of hardcover for this lot. <br /> Winkey indicated the applicant currently has a property that does not include a driveway in the amount of <br /> hardcover on the lot. Winkey stated the amount of hardcover being proposed by the applicant is similar <br /> to the amount that would be required if a driveway had been located on the property originally. Winkey <br /> stated realistically a driveway is required and the applicant should be granted some hardcover to <br /> accommodate that, which comes out to approximately 35 percent. <br /> Vogstrom stated overall the existing hardcover and future hardcover would be 1900 square feet less with <br /> the new proposal. <br /> Leslie stated the 690 square feet for the driveway is now presumed to be part of the lot and that the <br /> hardcover in the fire lane is not being added to the amount that would be allowed. <br /> Jurgens inquired what 690 plus the existing hardcover number comes out to. <br /> Vogstrom stated it would be 36.1 percent hardcover. <br /> Rahn stated due to the configuration of the lot and the two 0-75' zones, it only leaves 7,600 square feet in <br /> the 75-250' zone. Rahn stated the zones established by the City do not always work on lots similar to this <br /> property and that if the City only required a certain percentage be met, this discussion would probably not <br /> be necessary. Rahn noted due to the small amount of buildable land within the 75'-250' zone, the <br /> hardcover percentage would be larger than normal. Rahn indicated he does not feel the driveway can be <br /> reduced further. <br /> Essen inquired whether the hardcover on the right-of-way would be removed. <br /> Gaffron stated that issue should be reserved for the City Council and perhaps in conjunction with the Park <br /> Commission and the Public Works Department to determine what the function and potential use of the <br /> fire lane is and whether the existing hardcover needs to be there to serve some public purpose. Gaffron <br /> stated the final decision concerning the driveway in the fire lane should be up to the City Council. <br /> Essen indicated he would not be opposed to shifting the house five feet to the north and have a variance <br /> granted in order to give more room to deal with the water runoff on the south side of the house. <br /> PAGE 4 <br />