Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MONDAY, JULY 19, 2004 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (5. #04-3026 David Pomije, 801 Tonkawa Road,Variance, Public Hearing-Continued) <br /> b. Lake set back variance to allow a deck setback of 39' where 75' is required and 49' <br /> currently exists (house). <br /> c. Bluff impact zone encroachment of 25'. <br /> Curtis referred to the 1992 variance approval for this property resulted in hardcover removal. Since <br /> that time, the existing path to the lake had been upgraded to a 4' stone paver path with stairs, which <br /> provide a safer path down the steep slope. She indicated staff determined that the hardcover <br /> calculated in 1992 did not include this existing path and now makes it appear that the 2004 hardcover <br /> calculation is 2%higher than in 1992. The path hardcover accounts for the additional 2%,not an <br /> increase in the size of the deck. Curtis stated staff found that due to the existing location of the home <br /> there may be a hardship to allow the deck to be rebuilt. Additionally, the deck provides a safe "yard" <br /> area for the applicants to enjoy the lakeside of their property from the home. <br /> Curtis recommended approval of the after-the-fact lake setback and hardcover variances as the <br /> location of the existing home and replacement nearly in-kind of a pre-existing deteriorated non- <br /> conforming deck constitute hardship in this situation. <br /> Mr. Sequira pointed out the proposed deck portion to the south eliminates the 18"drop to existing <br /> pavers at the doorway that exists the dining area. He stated their goal is to create a level area as it is <br /> close to the bluff to make it safer when stepping from the house. Chair Rahn asked Mr. Sequira if the <br /> submitted hardcover calculations reflect this deck portion. Mr. Sequira indicated that the hardcover <br /> calculations do include this deck area, and referred to Exhibit E. for clarification. <br /> There followed a discussion that clarified exactly what hardcover calculations had been approved in <br /> 1992 and what was included or excluded from the 2004 hardcover calculations. Chair Rahn <br /> summarized that the rebuilding of the existing deck has no further encroachment into the 0-75' <br /> setback. <br /> Chair Rahn asked for public comments. There were none. <br /> Jurgens asked for further clarification of the proposed hardcover calculations,referring to Page 3 of <br /> the June 15, 2004 Staff Report. Chair Rahn requested the record to indicate that the hardcover <br /> calculation increase from 11.1%to 13.2% results from the allowed path/access to the lake and not <br /> from any additional deck hardcover. <br /> Bremer moved, Kempf seconded,to recommend approval of Application #04-3026, David <br /> Pomije, 801 Tonkawa Road, granting after-the-fact lake setback and 0-75' hardcover variances <br /> in order to reconstruct (and reconfigure) a deck, consisting of the following: <br /> a. Hardcover within 0-75' of 11% or 3,464.3 s.f. <br /> b. Lake set back variance to allow a deck setback of 39' where 75' is required and 49' <br /> currently exists (house). <br /> c. Bluff impact zone encroachment of 25'. <br /> VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br /> Page 4 of 13 <br />