Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MONDAY, APRIL 19, 2004 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (8. #04-3002 G & L LAND INVESTMENT, LLC, 740 NORTH ARM DRIVE, VARIANCE— <br /> Continued) <br /> Chair Mabusth asked for information about the types of public works equipment that are necessary <br /> to service the manhole and sewer line. <br /> Gundlach reported that she spoke with the Public Works Department and was advised there are only <br /> two places where a truck can be brought to clean the sewer line, one of which is on this lot. She <br /> pointed out a defined access pathway from the top of the slope to the bottom of the slope has existed <br /> for many years. The other location on North Arm requires a tow-truck to remove the truck after it is <br /> filled. <br /> Mr. Tim Guilfoil, 740 North Arm Dr, reminded the Planning Commission that they are substantially <br /> reducing the hardcover on this property. He disagreed with the idea that the boathouse, which is 65% <br /> concrete, could be removed without heavy equipment that may not be able to travel to its location. <br /> Mr. Guilfoil stated they will need to get equipment down to the boathouse and cannot work from <br /> above due to its steep slope, requiring them to work on the sewer line that is 6' deep. The boathouse <br /> precedes the sewer line by at least 10 years so it seems heavy-handed to force the applicant to remove <br /> the boathouse and hold them liable for any subsequent sewer line damages that may occur. <br /> Mr. Guilfoil stated the above-mentioned factors are viable hardships. He advised the neighbors are <br /> not opposed to this and that the boathouse is charming, does not block anybody's long view of the <br /> lake and they intend to do some improvement to it. <br /> If the boathouse is allowed to remain, Chair Mabusth asked what improvements are planned for it, <br /> commenting that it is not a very attractive structure now. <br /> Mr. Guilfoil explained the boathouse exterior would match the principal structure. He stated it is a <br /> long way down to the lake if you take the long path or if you take the steps. <br /> Chair Mabusth pointed out the steps are in need of repair. <br /> Mr. Guilfoil indicated they would fix the steps, as they are a safety hazard now. <br /> Chair Mabusth asked Mr. Guilfoil for his opinion about staff's recommendation that a structure could <br /> be built at the top of the 75' setback. <br /> Gundlach clarified a new structure would have to be placed behind the house to meet the average <br /> lakeshore setback requirement. <br /> Mr. Guilfoil remarked that a structure there would not really solve anything. If it could be placed at <br /> the top of the slope but then it would be in the 75' zone. <br /> Chair Mabusth explained that allowing the non-conforming boathouse to remain is against the <br /> Planning Commission precedence with previous applications where new construction occurred and <br /> non-conforming structures were required to be removed. She indicated she appreciated the <br /> applicant's concerns about the underlying sewer line but expects the City would work somehow with <br /> the applicant and review how it would be done. <br /> Page 35 of 49 <br />