My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/15/2004 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
03/15/2004 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2012 10:30:44 AM
Creation date
3/9/2012 10:30:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, March 15, 2004 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#11. #04-2994 LANDFORM, STEVE JOHNSTON,REPRESENTING SWERVO <br /> DEVELOPMENT, 875 W. WAYZATA BLVD., COMPREHENSIVE PLAN <br /> AMENDMENT-Continued) <br /> Fritzler stated he doesn't see this as a pressing issue to re-zone. Any construction on this site <br /> would be going on while Highway 12 is being constructed and would create more of a traffic <br /> problem. <br /> Applicant responded about the difficulty of how to engineer the site with steep banks to the Luce <br /> Line. MNDOT is trying to find a place for all the dirt that will come from Highway 12 <br /> construction and he would like to put the dirt on this site. <br /> Chair Smith stated that if the two-acre minimum remains, that the dirt placement still could <br /> happen in conjunction with the development of Highway 12. <br /> Chair Smith determined a poll of the commission was needed. <br /> Berg said she finds the site hard to see as a two-acre site and thinks it is a site for higher density <br /> but doesn't know what density. Does not see 6 units per acre for sure as that is too dense. <br /> Applicant wants to table the application, not withdraw the application. He said his client is not <br /> interested in a two-acre site. His client is not any hurry to develop the site and can come to the <br /> city every six months. <br /> Gaffron stated that if the council denies the application, the applicant couldn't come back to the <br /> commission for six months. If the commission tables the application it would be useful to <br /> provide applicant with some guidelines for what the commission would like to see for this site. <br /> Gaffron also asked if the commission would like to look at the project again in a month or two <br /> depending on the applicant's needs. <br /> Chair Smith indicated that it seems five out of seven commissioners would like the property to <br /> stay at a two-acre minimum for the foreseeable future so it may be better to deny the application. <br /> She doesn't see what would change in a month or two to change the commission's stance. <br /> Gaffron asked if the project had been brought to you at two-units per acre would that have <br /> changed any opinions. <br /> Chair Smith asked if this was an opportunity for cluster housing. Gaffron responded <br /> affirmatively. He continued by saying three houses could be placed clustered together via a PRD <br /> at a low density that doesn't take up the whole site. You could locate them on some portion of <br /> the site that is efficient and save more of the wetlands. <br /> Chair Smith said the Fleming property is cluster housing around a wetland. <br /> The applicant stated the cluster system needs more than the one septic system. <br /> Page 34 of 48 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.