My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/15/2004 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
03/15/2004 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2012 10:30:44 AM
Creation date
3/9/2012 10:30:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, March 15, 2004 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#5. #04-2988 SEAN AND LEAH DALEY, 605 PARK LANE, AFTER-THE-FACT <br /> VARIANCE —Continued) <br /> 3. After-the-fact average lakeshore setback variance to encroach 3.5' into the average lakeshore <br /> setback with the newly constructed deck. <br /> 4. After-the-fact structural coverage variance to allow 21.4% structural coverage where 1,500 <br /> s.f. (17 %) is allowed. <br /> Hardship: Staff does not find hardships to support the after-the-fact variances. <br /> The applicants, Sean and Leah Daly, are the property owners at 605 Park Lane. This property is <br /> .2 acres. The applicants are requesting after-the-fact variances in order to allow newly <br /> constructed decks to remain, and allow re-construction of a new 2nd story deck. After <br /> purchasing the property the applicants removed the existing decks that were rotted, unsafe and <br /> not functionally efficient with the layout of the home as they existed. They also removed <br /> sidewalk, and installed boulder walls in order to make their property more functional. Not <br /> realizing that permits were required, the applicants replaced the decks. <br /> The applicants are also requesting to replace a 2nd story deck(36 s.f.) on the lakeside of the <br /> property. The existing house is set back 3.2' from the side property line where a 10' setback is <br /> required. The deck, which was replaced, encroached equally into the side yard setback. The <br /> applicants, in rebuilding the deck, have maintained the setback at 4.2' from the side lot line <br /> where 10' is required. <br /> The previous owners received variance approval for a garage addition in 1986, which limited the <br /> 75'-250' zone to a total of 52.2%hardcover, and the 0-75'zone to 2.5% (see Exhibit J). Since <br /> 1986, a shed, decks, driveway, and additional hardcover have been added to the property without <br /> City approval. The applicants have removed approximately 142 s.f. of hardcover from the 75'- <br /> 250' setback zone, including a paved sidewalk on the north side of the home. When the <br /> applicants purchased the property it had a total hardcover level of 61.2%. <br /> Permits were not obtained in the reconstruction and removal of the decks, sidewalk, and other <br /> hardcover in order to accurately document the square footage removed. Had a permit been <br /> applied for by the applicants; the property would have been reviewed and the new, un-permitted, <br /> deck and hardcover additions would have been noted and the building permit most likely would <br /> not have been granted without bringing the property back to the approved 1986 hardcover levels. <br /> Staff has included the Hennepin County Assessor's report (Exhibit D)to illustrate the size and <br /> configuration of the decks, which were reconstructed by the applicants. <br /> Historically, in reviewing similar applications, staff has consistently applied 0-75' setback zone <br /> hardcover overages to the 75'-250' zones. This property currently has 10.17%hardcover in the <br /> 0-75' zone where none is allowed. Consequently, the 420 s.f. of hardcover in the 0-75' zone <br /> shall be applied to the 75'-250' zone, which brings the hardcover level for the 75'-250' zone <br /> from 58.2 % to 67%. <br /> Page 11 of 48 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.