My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/20/2004 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
01/20/2004 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2012 10:28:26 AM
Creation date
3/9/2012 10:28:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Tuesday, January 20, 2004 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (MIKE KEAVENY ON BEHALF OF RICHARD M. KEAVENY REV. TRUST,3425 <br /> SHORELINE DRIVE, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND COMMERCIAL SITE <br /> PLAN REVIEW—Continued) <br /> Evans questioned whether the parking ratios as laid out were accurate. <br /> Rahn stated that the plan doesn't reflect what's precisely required for parking and <br /> landscaping to determine whether these are adequate and requested further information. <br /> Evans noted that staff has merely estimated a reduction of 11 spaces to allow for green <br /> space. He reiterated that 94 spaces below, and 53 spaces above for a total of 147 spaces is <br /> what is required by zoning ordinance. <br /> Acting Chair Mabusth maintained that a further detailed study would need to be provided <br /> to determine specific amounts, which would enable the Commission to base its judgment. <br /> While not uncommon for commercial property, Gundlach recognized that a parking <br /> variance may be required, especially, in light of the differences in the hours of operation of <br /> all the individual businesses on site. <br /> Although a parking variance might be found acceptable now, Evans encouraged the <br /> Commission to consider what the future use of this site might be. For instance, if used as <br /> retail the site might require even more additional parking. He maintained that, when he and <br /> his neighbors purchased their homes, there was simply a bowling alley with limited use <br /> which resided at this location, he never would have imagined a full liquor licensed <br /> restaurant use would move in next door. <br /> As the next door neighbor most affected, Bertagnoli asked where the venting for the <br /> restaurant would be. <br /> Keaveny stated that he would work with the franchisee and the City on the ventilation and <br /> air conditioning placement. <br /> Ode reiterated that, in order to be successful bowling alleys need this combination of <br /> services; restaurant, liquor license, and bowling alley. <br /> Acting Chair Mabusth moved,Rahn seconded, to table Application#04-2977, <br /> Michael Keaveny,3425 Shoreline Drive, a Commercial Site Plan Review and <br /> Conditional Use Permit., subject to receiving a complete site plan,parking plan and <br /> analysis of needs, locate loading areas, type of lighting, signage locations, minimum <br /> green space of 10' along both avenues,landscaping plan, staircase repair,type of <br /> exterior materials and elevations,proposed improvements to the structure, and <br /> exhaust fan location. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> PAGE 52 of 53 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.