Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Tuesday, January 20, 2004 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (MIKE KEAVENY ON BEHALF OF RICHARD M. KEAVENY REV. TRUST,3425 <br /> SHORELINE DRIVE, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND COMMERCIAL SITE <br /> PLAN REVIEW—Continued) <br /> Road 19 versus trying to access Shoreline Drive to reach County Road 19. He maintained <br /> that Kelly Avenue was not designed to handle a lot of traffic. <br /> Bremer asked if the proximity to Lake Minnetonka was a concern. <br /> Fritzler stated that he could envision people trying, albeit unsuccessfully, to access the <br /> restaurant via boat or snowmobile. <br /> Rahn asked how the City would be able to deal with the additional noise levels once the <br /> license has been issued. He noted that this is the same type of issues faced by residents <br /> living near Al &Alma's and admitted it is a conditional use which is allowed. He believed <br /> more thought needed to be devoted to the consideration of hours of operation. <br /> Fritzler stated that it is difficult to regulate how loud the use is, since the violations follow <br /> the individual and not the facility. <br /> Gaffron indicated that the negative impacts can be reduced with a CUP. If it is allowed, the <br /> City can place certain limitations upon it up front, and then have to live with their decision. <br /> Keaveny reminded the Commission that it is not their intent to attract the same audience as <br /> that of the Narrows Saloon. <br /> Gaffron asked if bowling would be available during other hours than the restaurant. <br /> Ode stated that the two operations would have separate entrances and closed off from one <br /> another. <br /> Bremer referenced the old adage, `in for a penny, in for a pound', referring to the fact that <br /> if the City wishes to improve the site it must also be willing to accept what comes with it. <br /> Evans asked what provision for parking of delivery trucks and what procedures would be <br /> followed in the proposal. <br /> Keaveny stated that he had referenced where the delivery trucks would be allowed in his <br /> proposal. <br /> Evans pointed out that the lane provided for delivery trucks should be revised, since the <br /> plan also identifies these as parking spots as well. <br /> Keaveny mentioned that the loading area could be in the back near the storage to the west. <br /> PAGE 51 of 53 <br />