Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Tuesday,January 18,2005 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#04-2987 Hashem Abukhadra, Continued) <br /> Gronberg stated currently there are three parcels and the property owners would like to construct one <br /> additional house. Gronberg stated the lot lines would need to be relocated in order to locate that one <br /> additional house. <br /> Rahn stated the guesthouse could be removed prior to the time that lot is improved. <br /> Bremer commented in her view the guesthouse should be dealt with at the time of the subdivision rather <br /> than at the time lot 6 is developed. <br /> Gaffron inquired when the new road within the outlot would be created. <br /> Gronberg stated in his view construction of the new road would be delayed. <br /> Jurgens inquired what lot the new house would be constructed on. <br /> Gronberg stated either lot 1, 2, or 4. <br /> Fritzler stated the existing road would not meet the requirements for the new subdivision. <br /> Gaffron commented there has to be some sort of a division since you cannot construct two principal <br /> residences on one lot. <br /> Jurgens inquired whether there would be a performance bond required to ensure that the new road be built <br /> at some future date as part of this development. <br /> Gaffron suggested showing the outline of the property as it currently exists and then show the proposed <br /> lots and what is proposed for the future. Gaffron stated Staff would like to have more information on <br /> what could possibly happen in the future. <br /> Jurgens stated in his view a decision should be made on where the new house will be constructed so the <br /> other issues can be addressed. Jurgens inquired whether Staff is going to require proof of hardcover on <br /> the new lots. <br /> Gaffron noted this is a sketch plan stage and that the applicant has been given some good direction on <br /> some of these issues. <br /> Jurgens commented he would like to see the guesthouse removed since it is nonconforming and that he <br /> would like some confirmation that the building envelopes for these lots are workable. Jurgens indicated <br /> he would also like to see only one access onto Fox Street. <br /> Winkey stated he would like to see lots that do not require variances. <br /> The Planning Commission took no formal action on this item. <br /> PAGE 9 <br />