Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 2001 <br />• Fire Station Presentation — Continued <br />Jabbour stated that Long Lake believes the money belongs solely to them and Orono <br />should have no ownership of the site, and the Long Lake attorney agrees with them. The <br />ownership issue should be dealt with before the Mn/DOT money issue is settled. <br />Nygard and Sansevere stated they found it difficult to approve the plans when they were <br />not presented with any alternatives to consider, or any evidence that the proposed plan <br />was the best option available. <br />Jabbour stated he regretted that Flint was not present for the discussion. He stated the <br />options available to the Council were to 1) let Long Lake build the station as they see fit, <br />2) to give them the $680,000 they requested but state the station is not to exceed that <br />amount, and 3) to get a commitment that Orono would be a partner in making sure the <br />plans do not exceed the agreed to amounts. He did not feel that Long Lake should own <br />the station when it would be in Orono. <br />Mayor Peterson stated that she, the mayor of Long Lake, and several staff members <br />would be meeting with a third party consultant about the fire station. She stated that the <br />issues of ownership and the waiver were topmost priorities. <br />. Jabbour suggested passing a resolution stating the Council would endorse the cost <br />discussed at the joint meeting, would work on the ownership issue with Long Lake, and <br />would not allow a building in Orono that Orono does not own in part. <br />White and Sansevere expressed they took issue with being asked to accept a 25% budget <br />increase and make a decision on the spot without knowing if that was truly the best <br />option. Sansevere stated he supported the work Gabriel Jabbour and Mike Bash were <br />doing as the Cities' representatives. <br />Jabbour asked if he could report to the fire chief that Orono would consider the higher <br />proposed cost. The Council agreed they were willing to negotiate. He stated the cities <br />should 1) agree to the proposed building up to 20,000+ s.f., 2) agree on a cost cap and <br />agree to spend less money if possible, 3) agree to joint ownership, 4) agree to work <br />together on the design of the station. <br />Barrett stated that the Mn/DOT money should be put in escrow and unless all three <br />parties agree on its use, the money cannot be spent. <br />Moorse stated that the cost cap of $680,000 would be subject to an ownership agreement <br />being made. He suggested that any money not spent on the station from the cities' <br />contribution to the total cost be put in a fund for the future purchase of equipment. <br />11 <br />