My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-12-2001 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2001
>
03-12-2001 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2012 4:29:42 PM
Creation date
3/5/2012 4:29:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, MARCH 12, 2001 <br />0 SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT — Continued <br />0 <br />• <br />2. Applicant: Rick and Gail Luzaich <br />Event: Bar -B -Q and Picnic <br />Location: 2490 Old Beach Road <br />Date: June 16, 2001 <br />Time: 1:00 P.M. –10:00 P.M. <br />SET -UP LICENSE <br />Dan Scherven <br />Navarre Lanes, Inc. <br />3435 Shoreline Drive <br />*17. BILLS <br />White moved, and Sansevere seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds <br />Account. <br />Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />Fire Station Presentation <br />Gabriel Jabbour and Jim Murphy presented information about the fire station to the <br />Council. They met with Long Lake officials on Sunday. <br />Jabbour stated that the fire station committee has an appropriate site selected with zero <br />condemnation, at a moderate price, and agreement from Mn/DOT for around $3.5 million <br />for the construction of the fire station. He stated if Long Lake and Orono couldn't agree <br />on the station's size and cost, all of the work to date could prove useless. He <br />recommended to Council that the station should be built as proposed to prevent an <br />argument. He stated that ownership is a major issue for Long Lake. He felt Orono and <br />Long Lake should own the station jointly. <br />Murphy stated that the Long Lake Council felt Orono was adamant about the maximum <br />cost of the station. He stated he called Sunday's meeting simply because he wanted to <br />keep the dialogue open. The deal with Mn/DOT on replacement cost should be <br />completed before more work is done. The cities should come together on the Mn/DOT <br />payment of around $2.5 million. Mn/DOT would like to finish the project, and the cities <br />are losing interest on the money by not having an agreement in place that enables <br />Mn/DOT to release the money. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.