Laserfiche WebLink
It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Smith, to recommend approval of application # 1858 <br />for John and Marla Meridith, 3685 Watertown Road for variances discussed being that the <br />accessory structure is 4,800 s.f. instead of the allowable 3,000 s.f. Smith added that if the <br />• property was ever subdivided, the owner would take responsibility for those structures. Also <br />required is the updated survey, and the understanding that maximum allowable horses on this <br />property is 7 based on the size of the land and is for personal use and not a business. Vote: <br />Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />• <br />(#10) #1859 JEFFREY H. MUELLER <br />222 BEDERWOOD DRIVE - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING <br />Mr. Mueller was present. <br />Mabusth explained that the applicant seeks approval of a setback variance that would allow <br />an accessory structure to be placed in the front of the front line of the principle structure. The <br />structure will also require a side setback variance. The improvement involves a complete <br />replacement of the detached garage within the street yard of the property. It will be built within <br />the current building envelope. <br />Mabusth asked the applicant whether he could move the structure over enough to meet the side <br />setback. <br />Mr. Mueller agreed that he could do that. <br />It was moved by Rowlette, seconded by Berg, to recommend approval of application #1859 <br />for Jeffrey H. Mueller, 222 Bederwood Drive for accessory structure built in front of the front <br />line of the principle structure. Vote: Ayes 7 Nays 0. <br />( #11) #1860 ZELMA H. MCKINNEY <br />3599 LIVINGSTON AVENUE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC <br />HEARING <br />Mrs. McKinney was present and accompanied by her daughter, Gayle Siegler. <br />Mabusth explained that property is located in Navarre Heights on Livingston street. Mrs. <br />McKinney purchased the property in May, 1962 when triplex use would have been permitted. <br />It was always used as a rental property. There have been zoning amendments since whereby <br />only single family residential use would be allowed. Mrs. McKinney is applying for a <br />conditional use permit per Section 3 1. 100 of the 1975 Code. Mrs. McKinney seeks approval <br />of two residential units; one to be owner - occupied and the other a rental apartment. The <br />majority of neighbors that called were satisfied to hear that the property would be owner- <br />occupied duplex and only one neighbor preferred to see the property revert to single family <br />dwelling status. <br />Commission members felt the property was visually appealing and if the property did revert <br />to single family, the exterior of the structure would not be altered in anyway. <br />13 <br />