My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/19/1993 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
01/19/1993 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2012 12:03:19 PM
Creation date
2/28/2012 12:03:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD JANUARY 19, 1993 <br />i <br />ZONING FILE #1627 - CONT. <br />Rowlette felt they should be given the opportunity to review the <br />property prior to making a decision. <br />Cohen stated he would not approve after- the -fact hardcover <br />installed within the 0 -75' zone, and agreed with Rowlette that they <br />should be allowed to inspect the property. <br />Chair Bellows indicated the proposal is based on an engineer's <br />opinion, not a signed recommendation by a licensed engineer. She <br />felt If this were approved they would be allowing a potential for <br />the decks to be rebuilt In the future. She felt the deck attached <br />to the residence Is enormous, and she felt that should be reduced <br />to meet the 75' setback. <br />Anderson stated his client would not object to reducing the size <br />of the attached deck. <br />Chair Bellows suggested tabling the application to allow the <br />applicant time to complete the following: 1) the engineering to be <br />done properly, including modification of the retaining walls; 2) <br />revise the plans so that any flat area remaining is not wider than <br />3'; 3) deck attached to cabin to be altered so as not to encroach <br />the 0 -75' setback area; and 4) portions of retaining walls needed <br />to support decks to be removed. <br />Johnson asked how much of the retaining wall system was installed <br />to retain the slope versus how much was built to support the <br />decking. He supported the Idea of retaining the slopes that fell <br />In from the storm. <br />Anderson stated he could not answer that question. <br />It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Schroeder, to table Application <br />#1627 for Samuel A. McCloud, Big Island Record Lot 22, to allow the <br />applicant time to revise his proposal and submit any additional <br />required documents. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />Chair Bellows recommended the applicant resubmit his proposal in <br />time for the Planning Commission to visit the property. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.