My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/19/1993 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
01/19/1993 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2012 12:03:19 PM
Creation date
2/28/2012 12:03:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r� <br />u <br />i <br />r� <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD JANUARY 19, 1993 <br />ROLL <br />The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the <br />following members present: Acting Planning Commission Chair <br />Maureen Bellows, Charles Schroeder, Candace Rowlette, Jeff Johnson <br />and Ed Cohen. Stephen Peterson was absent. The following <br />represented the City Staff: Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, <br />Septic Manager Stephen Weckman, and City Recorder Teri Naab. <br />Edward Callahan, Gabriel Jabbour and JoEllen Hurr were present. <br />Chair Bellows called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. <br />( #1) $1627 SAMUEL A. MCCLOUD, <br />BIG ISLAND RECORD LOT 22 - VARIANCE - <br />CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:00 - 7:25 P.M. <br />David Anderson was present for the application. <br />Mabusth reviewed the former application for the Planning Commission <br />that involved a lot line rearrangement in March 1991, and an after <br />the -fact variance dealing with decking, retaining walls, and <br />extensive stairways, which were constructed some time after the <br />1987 storm. She noted 40 s.f. of the deck attached to the existing <br />residence and all decking near the lake are within the 0 -75' zone. <br />Proposed hardcover within the lakeshore has been reduced and <br />retaining walls remain, which the applicant proposes to minimize <br />the 3.2 to 5 visual impact with plantings. The applicant proposes <br />3.2% hardcover in the 0 -75' zone versus 10.8% existing. <br />Anderson reviewed the types of plantings he proposes for the <br />property. <br />Cohen asked what comprises the 3.2% hardcover proposed. <br />Mabusth explained prior to the 1987 storm, the property had <br />approximately 1% 0 -75' hardcover which comprised a stairway to the <br />lake necessary because of the steep slopes. The 3.2% proposed <br />hardcover Includes the 40 s.f. of deck attached to the dwelling. <br />Chair Bellows expressed concern about allowing the retaining walls <br />to remain, which in essence is the "bones" for the decking, and <br />questioned what is to stop the applicant from rebuilding the deck <br />areas. She asked how the building inspector felt about the <br />plantings versus the railing along the retaining walls. <br />Mabusth stated plantings as such have been approved before in other <br />locations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.