Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />40 HELD JANUARY 21, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE #1708 — CONT. <br />Chair Kelley concurred with Bellows. He noted that if the property <br />were later subdivided, the oversized accessory structure would have <br />to meet the standards pertaining to it. <br />It was moved by Moos, seconded by Schroeder, to recommend approval <br />of Application #1708 for Judson Dayton, 825 Old Crystal Bay Road <br />South, to approve a variance to the oversized accessory structure <br />ordinance allowing an addition to an existing accessory structure, <br />based on the intention of the ordinance to limit the number of <br />accessory structures and the proposed building does not exceed the <br />total allowed square footage. Ayes 6, nays 0. <br />Mabusth explained Application #1709 involves the renovation of a <br />guest apartment located on the second floor at the south end of <br />the accessory structure. Access to the apartment is via a doorway <br />on the south side through the maintenance garage. <br />Dayton explained he has no intention to make it an apartment at <br />this time, but rather the intent is to repair the existing area. <br />Bellows noted that if plumbing is provided, that is the issue and <br />IV the reason for the conditional use permit. <br />Mabusth stated that the apartment is being supplied with plumbing. <br />Cohen explained that once again if the property were subdivided in <br />the future, pertinent ordinances would have to be adhered to. <br />Chair Kelley pointed out that the property contains two principal <br />structures, one for the caretaker. <br />Mabusth indicated that both structures are old and was not aware <br />of a conditional use permit being granted. The applicant is not <br />proposing any changes to the caretaker residence. <br />Dayton explained that the Lymans added onto the caretaker residence <br />about 5 years ago and perhaps a conditional use permit had been <br />issued then. <br />Chair Kelley felt that the issue should be addressed at this time <br />to avoid any future problems. <br />Cohen noted that a public notice and certificate of mailing would <br />need to be done to fulfill requirements. He suggested the issue <br />be brought back at the next meeting. <br />V 7 <br />