Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />40 HELD JANUARY 21, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE #1707 - CONT. <br />Rowlette asked what effect the new shoreland regulations will have <br />upon the property. <br />Mabusth stated that Rhode had been cautioned that these regulations <br />may affect his property, however she stated that the regulations <br />may not have that much impact on general development lake <br />properties such as this property. <br />Rhode noted that he is still trying to sell his other house and <br />will not proceed with the reconstruction of this house until the <br />sale is complete. He realizes that there may be changes in the <br />shore land regulations, and noted he is willing to take that chance. <br />It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Moos, to recommend approval of <br />Application #1707 for Jack Rhode, 1690 Shadywood Road, for a <br />renewal variance to reconstruct the existing residence, based on <br />the hardships and findings stated in past applications for this <br />property. Ayes 6, nays 0. <br />( #6) #1708 & #1709 JUDSON DAYTON, <br />825 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOUTH - <br />VARIANCE /CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - <br />PUBLIC HEARING 7:37 -7:50 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />acknowledged. <br />Judson Dayton was present for this application. <br />Mabusth explained Application #1708 involves expansion of an <br />oversized accessory structure on the former Lyman property, which <br />Mr. Dayton now owns. The expansion to the east side will be <br />approximately 23'x32'. She stated that the accessory structure <br />ordinance doesn't take into consideration properties which are <br />larger than the maximum noted in the ordinance at 9 acres. She <br />stated that the 5,168 s.f. proposed structure will still not exceed <br />the total area allowed at 6,000 s.f. for all accessory structures, <br />on the 23+ acre property. <br />Bellows stated that the intent of the ordinance was not to promote <br />several smaller structures on a parcel that would be 1 s.f. less <br />than the maximum allowed, and she noted it is preferred that an <br />owner build fewer, larger structures. She noted that this proposal <br />is certainly within the scale of what is located on the property <br />at present. <br />