My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-16-1991 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
09-16-1991 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2012 9:03:49 AM
Creation date
2/28/2012 9:03:48 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — SEPTEMBER 16, 1991 <br />ZONING FILE #1666 — CONT. <br />Rowlette asked how we would deal with the future owner who <br />• wants access to the northern lot. <br />Mabusth noted that legal access to Lot C1 would have to be <br />approved prior to final plat approval, and Lot C1 would be the <br />building envelope with no access available to Lot C. <br />Dan Johnson felt that it would be the future owners of Lot <br />C1 and C's responsibility to determine prior to purchase their <br />abilities to gain access over the Luce Line. <br />Cohen had a problem approving the use of Lot C for credit <br />for Lot C1 as you could never use that portion of property for <br />anything. <br />Johnson asked about rezoning Lot C1. <br />Mabusth noted that they originally did not rezone this <br />portion because they did not want to create higher density in <br />this area. <br />Schroeder suggested that Lot C1 be rezoned to 2 acre zoning <br />with the provision that Lot C be given to the park. He felt Lot <br />C has very little value to anyone buying the property. <br />Burger noted that the market value on that piece is $16,000 <br />and he pays about $800 per year in taxes. He noted that he <br />originally bought the property with the intent of a PUD, however <br />• that never materialized. He also had thought Lot C may be used <br />for the septic system for Lot C1 if the DNR would grant a <br />temporary building easement over the Luce Line. Burger noted <br />that he could dedicate Lot C for park use, but he would rather do <br />something else. <br />Mabusth noted that the access easement from the property on <br />Bayside Landing would be through the homeowners private drive, <br />which would eliminate the need for a drive across the wetlands. <br />Cohen noted that he would not approve a subdivision <br />contingent upon the availability of sewer. <br />Burger noted that if he cannot go ahead and purchase the <br />access easement which is now available to him, he would have to <br />build a drive across the wetland in the future, and he would <br />rather not do that. <br />Johnson felt that density credit should be given to Lot C1 <br />for Lot C. <br />Mabusth asked if the Commission would approve a width <br />variance for Lot C1 if approved. <br />Cohen noted that he would grant such a variance. He also <br />. noted that two members of the Commission were absent. <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.