My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-16-1991 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
09-16-1991 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2012 9:03:49 AM
Creation date
2/28/2012 9:03:48 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING — SEPTEMBER 16, 1991 <br />ZONING FILE #1685 — CONT. <br />It was moved by Schroeder, seconded by Moos, to recommend <br />• approval of application #1685, Edward F. Baker, for property <br />located at 3059 Farview Lane, for hardcover and setback variances <br />to reconstruct deck area and stairway. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />( #13) #1686 JOHN BURGER <br />3750 BAYSIDE ROAD <br />SKETCH PLAN REVIEW <br />John Burger and Dan Johnson of Burnett Realty were present <br />for this application. <br />Mabusth explained that Mr. Burger proposes a three lot <br />subdivision. Lots A and B are within the LR -1A, 2 acre zoning <br />district and Lots C plus C1 are within the RR -1A, 5 acre zoning <br />district. Lot C is located on the north side of the Luce Line. <br />Lot C1 is proposed as the building site, using Lot C for credit <br />to meet the 5 acre requirement. Lot C1 is 2 acres +, which meets <br />the 2 acre contiguous standard for rural lots. Mr. Burger would <br />execute a special lot combination to combine both lots. Lot C on <br />the north side would never be built upon. Within the last <br />several years, Mr. Burger has tried to gain access to his <br />northern lot, but to no avail. Lot C1 will need a width variance <br />as the lot only measures 210'. <br />She went on to explain that the subdivision as proposed is <br />presented as if it were a sewered property. Mr. Burger is <br />seeking credit of the wetland area. She asked the Commission if <br />they would consider the subdivision based on density credits for <br />• a sewered property, and condition the preliminary subdivision <br />approval subject to availability of sewer in the future. She <br />noted that this property has always been included in the proposed <br />sewered district. <br />Rowlette asked if this property is included in the <br />moratorium. <br />Mabusth agreed that the southern portion of the property is <br />included within the moratorium. She noted that Mr. Burger has <br />just received consent of an owner within Bayside Landing to sell <br />an access easement to his proposed Lot C1 & C. Up until now, he <br />has not been able to obtain any type of access easement. <br />Cohen felt that the southern portion should be put on hold <br />until sewer is approved for the area, but had no problem with the <br />northern lots. <br />Johnson noted that the moratorium restricts doing anything <br />at this point. <br />Mabusth explained that people can apply for a variance to <br />the moratorium if they can prove that the subdivision will not be <br />impacted by the shoreland regulations proposed, and at this <br />Aft areas. <br />we would be dealing with the property located in the rural <br />areas. <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.