Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, August 18, 2003 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#6#03-2919 KEVIN AND DEBORAH THOMPSON, Continued) <br /> Although not required in Orono, Hawn asked if the applicants had considered a fence. <br /> Thompson indicated that they had not gotten to that point, and that she would assume they <br /> would put in some kind of fencing. <br /> Rahn felt the edge of the pool already met the 15' required setback as proposed. <br /> Hawn encouraged the applicant to thicken up the screening on their property. While she <br /> felt the greenhouse constructed between the two buildings might be the most aesthetically <br /> pleasing alternative, Hawn stated that in order to be consistent the greenhouse could not <br /> attach the two. <br /> There were no public comments. <br /> Rahn agreed that there was no hardship to allow the greenhouse to be placed between the <br /> two structures. <br /> Gaffron pointed out that the approximate 10X15'greenhouse would need to be attached to <br /> the other end of the garage and under the combined 1000 s.f. allowance or moved 10' <br /> away. <br /> Chair Smith encouraged the applicant to work out with staff what additional screening <br /> might be necessary. <br /> Zugschwert moved,Rahn seconded, to recommend approval of Application#03- <br /> 2919, Kevin and Deborah Thompson, 90 Myrtlewood Road, granting approval of the <br /> side street setback variance for the 996 s.f accessory building, plumbing in an <br /> accessory structure, subject to the standard conditions, and a 15' side street setback <br /> variance for the pool subject to staff approved screening. In addition,the <br /> Commission would recommend denial of the variance to create an oversize accessory <br /> structure. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> (#7) #03-2922 IMAGINALITY ON BEHALF OF MIKE CASHMAN, 1655 AND 1685 <br /> FOX STREET,VARIANCE, 6:52—6:55 P.M. <br /> Myrna Ornstein, of Imaginality, was present on behalf of the applicant. <br /> Waataja explained that the proposal was originally heard at the July 21st Planning <br /> Commission meeting. At that time the applicants were instructed to work with staff on a <br /> redesign and conduct a wetland delineation. The applicant requests the following to allow <br /> placement of address monuments: <br /> PAGE 8 of 30 <br />