My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/17/03 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
07/17/03 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 3:49:52 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 3:49:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, July 21, 2003 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#12 #03-2915 NORTHERN SUNROOMS,INC. ON BEHALF OF SCOTT UDELL, <br /> Continued) <br /> only the view of the neighboring yards. <br /> b) Denial of the requested excess roof eave encroachment. <br /> While the existing roof eave encroaches 3.5' into the 10' side yard setback, only 1.5' of the eave <br /> is considered a non-encroachment. Applicant wishes to keep the existing eave. <br /> Udell maintained that they would confine the construction to building on top of existing <br /> structure. <br /> Rahn questioned where overhangs exist elsewhere on the home and whether the eyebrow would <br /> be flat or raised. <br /> Gaffron pointed out that the 3' overhang runs the entire length of the other side of the home. <br /> Chair Smith asked if the work could be done without the excess eave. <br /> Deah Udell stated that they needed the eave to reduce water and drainage problems. <br /> Mr. Lucas stated that, aesthetically, the applicant would wish to keep the existing overhang <br /> which matches the overhangs across the entire home. <br /> Mr. Udell stated that the inset eyebrow and 1-2" inset gutter would assist them in eliminating the <br /> flat rubber roof and water problems they face currently <br /> Hawn asked if the applicants could make the design work with no further overhang than <br /> currently exists. <br /> Chair Smith questioned why staff had recommended denial for the overhang. <br /> While, aesthetically, the overhang should be there, Gaffron stated that it encroaches and there is <br /> no hardship to support its approval. <br /> Udell maintained that without the overhang water pools at the corners and they need to be able to <br /> channel the water to the outside edges. <br /> There were no public comments. <br /> Hawn moved, Berg seconded, to recommend approval of Application #03-2915, Northern <br /> Sunrooms, Inc.for Scott Udell, 2166 Shadywood Road, granting the average lakeshore <br /> setback variance and excess roof eave encroachment. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br /> PAGE 19 of 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.