Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, July 21, 2003 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#11 #03-2913 STEWART AND GINA HANSEN, Continued) <br /> Hansen stated that she assumed the deck was part of the original submittal, as both the lakeside <br /> and streetside decks had been there for years and not reflected on the survey accurately. <br /> Hawn asked if the removals could be accomplished by the fall. <br /> Hansen stated that they could. <br /> Gaffron stated that, if one assumes the 6'X6' deck is structural, then the removals of the lakeside <br /> decks and slab results in a decrease of at least 20 s.f. <br /> Fritzler maintained that the removals would need to be accomplished before the final inspection. <br /> Hawn moved, Bremer seconded, to recommend approval of Application #03-2913, Stewart <br /> and Gina Hansen, granting the setback variance 5' from the side yard, subject to the <br /> removals of the lakeside deck structural coverage, shifting the stairs into the deck, and <br /> removing the concrete slab prior to final inspection, along with removals of fabric from the <br /> landscape beds. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br /> (#12) #03-2915 NORTHERN SUNROOMS, INC. ON BEHALF OF SCOTT UDELL, 2166 <br /> SHADYWOOD ROAD,VARIANCE, 8:28—8:45 P.M. <br /> Scott and Deah Udell, the applicant, and Joe Lucas, of Northern Sunrooms, were present. <br /> Foth reported that the applicant, Northern Sunrooms, Inc, on behalf of the owner requests a <br /> variance to allow an 8' encroachment of the average lakeshore setback for construction of a <br /> second-story porch addition. Also a variance for a side yard encroachment of roof eaves. The <br /> variances include: <br /> 1. Encroachment of 8' into the average lakeshore setback for a 13' x 11' second-story <br /> sunroom addition over the existing kitchen. <br /> 2. Existing roof eave 3.5'into side yard setback area. Only 1.5' is considered a non- <br /> encroachment therefore, the remaining 2' is considered encroachment. <br /> Note that: <br /> ■ Lot coverage by structures to remain at existing 3466 s.f. (18.3 %)where 15% is allowed— <br /> Variance granted in August 1993, file#1826. <br /> ■ Hardcover in 0-75'to remain at existing 229.5 s.f.(4.7 %) where no hardcover is allowed— <br /> Variance granted in August 1993, file#1826. <br /> ■ Hardcover in 75-250'zone will remain at existing 5021 s.f. or 41.9%, i.e. 600 s.f. less than <br /> the 5621 sf(46.8%) approved in 1993, where 25% is allowed—Variance granted in August <br /> 1993, file#1826. <br /> Based on the hardship due to the location of the residence, Foth indicated that staff would <br /> recommend: <br /> a) Approval of the average lakeshore setback variance. The addition would not encroach <br /> further into the average lakeshore setback than the existing home. The addition would <br /> not affect the views of the lake from the neighboring properties, rather potentially blocks <br /> PAGE 18 of 37 <br />