My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/17/03 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
07/17/03 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 3:49:52 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 3:49:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, July 21, 2003 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#8 #03-2907 JEFF AND CARA ZIEBARTH, Continued) <br /> application for redesign. <br /> Ziebarth stated that he had looked at other designs and believed that hardcover was more <br /> important than setback; therefore, they chose this layout. He stated that being given the 0-75' <br /> setback zone grace was insignificant, since the average lakeshore setback protrudes further than <br /> their home. <br /> Chair Smith indicated that the Commission had allowed limited side yard setbacks in the past. <br /> Gaffron stated that the Commission has gone so far as to approve 5' side yard setbacks, but no <br /> less on both sides of a tiny lot. <br /> Ziebarth maintained that he could rebuild a new 720 s.f. footprint home meeting all of the <br /> setbacks and questioned why he could not do this which was a smaller design. <br /> Hawn reiterated that the home would be too close to the side yard setbacks and too close to the <br /> neighbors. <br /> Fritzler commented, small lot, small house. <br /> Rahn agreed with staff recommendations. <br /> Mabusth suggested the applicant reconsider the detached garage in order to allow them <br /> additional living space. <br /> Ziebarth repeated that he felt the detached garage would have a negative impact on the design <br /> and increase their hardcover. <br /> Chair Smith asked the applicant whether the Commission should table or vote on the application. <br /> Ziebarth asked what other options there might be. <br /> Hawn stated that they had given the applicants direction. The Commission would consider <br /> something less than a 10' side yard setback, but no less than 5', more like 7.5' and encouraged <br /> him to consider this. <br /> In addition, Gaffron stated that, if the applicant chose new construction, he would be required to <br /> meet 25% hardcover, versus the rebuild design which allows him 45%. In reality, Gaffron <br /> indicated that new construction would most likely be identical to the hardcover of the rebuild. <br /> Ziebarth asked for further second story suggestions. <br /> PAGE 11 of 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.