My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/17/03 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
07/17/03 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 3:49:52 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 3:49:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, July 21, 2003 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#8 #03-2907 JEFF AND CARA ZIEBARTH, Continued) <br /> d) Drainage is still a concern, although from staff's perspective the most recent plan will <br /> actually reduce the magnitude of overland drainage from the rear half of this site. Staff <br /> believes the drainage issues are not made worse with this plan, and a suitable drainage <br /> plan incorporating swales and roof gutters can be devised to reduce any current drainage <br /> problems. <br /> When designing his proposal, Mr. Ziebarth stated that he believed hardcover to be the most <br /> important element of the design, as opposed to setbacks. He indicated that the biggest challenge <br /> he faced was the sewer easement, and the struggle to meet several requirements, and still get <br /> what they need for livable space. Ziebarth contended that, under the allowable calculations, he <br /> would only be allowed a 500 s.f second story if he were required to meet 10' side yard setbacks. <br /> He indicated that he had assumed they would be allowed to construct a second story above the <br /> existing first story. <br /> Chair Smith stated that the revised drainage plan seems doable and that the second story could <br /> encroach into the 0-75' setback; however, the side yard setbacks remain the issue. She stated <br /> that feedback from the neighbors at the last Commission meeting and letters in the packet still <br /> contend this to be an issue. <br /> Ziebarth stated that, in his opinion, his home has been overshadowed by neighboring properties, <br /> and that a precedent has already been set to the south allowing the second story, albeit further <br /> from the lot line. <br /> Kirk Otteson, 710 North Arm Drive, the neighbor to the south, indicated that his home is <br /> compliant 23' from the property line. He stated that, as proposed, this home would be larger than <br /> his home on a smaller piece of property. He maintained that if the home were located just 2' <br /> from his property line, and still two stories tall, the impact would be 10 times worse than his, <br /> which is compliant. Otteson stated that he was not allowed a walkout design; therefore, went <br /> with the two story plan. He objected to a two story home located 2' from his property line. <br /> Chair Smith asked for the applicant to comment on staff's recommendation that the garage be <br /> shifted. <br /> Ziebarth stated that moving the existing structure would compromise the layout of the house. He <br /> maintained that the design and look of the house would be substantially changed and that shifting <br /> the garage over would drastically block the house and any sunlight from its southwest corner. <br /> Chair Smith asked for Ziebarth to comment on the second story recommendation. <br /> Ziebarth stated that a 490 s.f. second story would look odd sitting atop the home. <br /> Chair Smith stated that the Commission could vote on what was in front of them or table the <br /> PAGE 10 of 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.