My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/21/03 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
04/21/03 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 3:46:20 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 3:46:20 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,April 21, 2003 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#11 #03-2889 RAVIA REAL ESTATE,LLC, Continued) <br /> Gaffron indicated that sidewalks were proposed to connect between the individual units <br /> and the parking lot, as well as a continuous service walk along the walkout side of the <br /> buildings, and a handicap ramp along the west side of the main lot. Attention would need <br /> to be paid to retaining walls near the parking area as well. It was determined that a <br /> walking trail connecting to the northwest corner of the property had little value, since it <br /> would not connect to any existing or planned trail system. <br /> With regard to the overall landscaping plan, Gaffron indicated that development of this site <br /> would be subject to the B-6 standards for landscaping. He noted that the applicants <br /> submitted landscaping plans have placed an emphasis on heavier planting at the corners of <br /> the property. The B-6 Code requires a screen (fence or compact evergreen hedge at least <br /> 6' high) not less than 50% opaque be located along lot lines between commercial uses and <br /> residential uses. While such screens might also take the form of a berm or retaining walls <br /> where the parking lot is recessed, Gaffron explained that, in addition, a landscaped buffer <br /> can soften the views of retaining walls. <br /> Gaffron maintained that staff's opinion would be to fill in any gaps in existing vegetative <br /> screening between the north parking lot and the Sugarwoods neighborhood . It would <br /> seem less necessary to provide such screening along the east side of the NE and SE <br /> buildings; a 6' privacy fence along that north-south lot line would probably detract from <br /> the view of the building. <br /> Gaffron indicated that the proposed plans for signage were included in the application and <br /> reminded the applicant that the subject property would be allowed 190 s.f of signage, <br /> based on the Code standards. <br /> While the applicants would be required to provide further detail, Gaffron acknowledged <br /> that proposed plans for lighting were included as well. <br /> Gaffron presented the floor plans and elevations for the buildings, as well as, the drawings <br /> of the facades. He explained that the facades most visible from off-site contain substantial <br /> architectural features to enhance their appearance and break up the visual length of the <br /> buildings. He believed that the applicants had provided a design that was sensitive to the <br /> surrounding properties; for instance, the long facades facing the senior housing building, <br /> while being the functional rear of those offices, offer stonework, columns, bays, and styled <br /> windows. The 6/12 pitched roofs will have asphalt"shingles" for a textured look. Siding is <br /> Hardie Plank or equivalent for low maintenance and good appearance. Stonework is a <br /> cultured "river rock" and its use on the walkout level columns greatly enhances the <br /> appearance of those higher facades. <br /> He continued, noting that the middle units (2/5, 1/3) of each building have a 6' deep <br /> proposed deck on the first story level on the walkout side. These decks add to the <br /> PAGE 21 of 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.