My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-19-2002 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
02-19-2002 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 2:28:51 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 2:28:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Tuesday,February 19,2002 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#02-2751 Mark Welch, Continued) <br /> Staff recommends approval of the application based on the hardships noted subject to the following <br /> conditions: <br /> 1. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided 10' along the north lot line and 5' along the <br /> interior property lines. <br /> 2. A final grading plan shall be submitted prior to review of the request by the City Council. <br /> 3. The existing shed and all hardcover proposed for removal is completed prior to a final inspection. <br /> 4. Gravel shall be removed from the proposed parking area to leave a minimum 3' setback to the <br /> property line. <br /> Linda Welch stated she does not have anything to add to Staff's report,noting she does have pictures <br /> of the embankment and the lot. <br /> There were no public comments relating to this application. <br /> Mabusth noted a lakeside deck is attached to the house, and questioned whether that is included as part <br /> of the house footprint. <br /> Weinberger stated the proposal only includes the house footprint and not the deck. Weinberger stated <br /> this lot would be entitled to 1,500 square feet of structural coverage,noting the proposed house is <br /> approximately 1,100 square feet. Weinberger stated the overhangs on the sides are approximately one <br /> foot, with the overhang on the lakeside being approximately three feet. <br /> Hawn inquired whether the overhang has been included in the structural coverage calculation. <br /> Weinberger stated it has not been included. <br /> Hawn stated since there is an existing house on this lot,the Applicant is entitled to a replacement, and in <br /> her view the Applicants have done a pretty good job at designing the house. <br /> Rahn inquired what the preferred width of a parking stall was. <br /> Weinberger stated in a commercial parking lot a stall is 9' by 20',which is generally what is <br /> recommended. <br /> Rahn commented he was looking at other possible locations for the parking stall and whether that could <br /> be reduced somewhat. <br /> Gaffron indicated they would also need to be 20' from a sewer line. <br /> Mabusth inquired where the well will be relocated to. <br /> PAGE 31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.