Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Monday,September 17,2001 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#01-2714 Frederick Puzak,Continued) <br /> septic sites. A third option would be that the Applicant obtain an easement for municipal sewer <br /> connection purposes from the adjacent property owner,which to date he has been unsuccessful in <br /> doing. <br /> Puzak stated he was able to amend his plan in response to Mr. Weinberger's report and obtain testing <br /> which demonstrates two suitable septic sites. <br /> Lindquist inquired whether whether they are located on Lot 31 and are more than 75 feet from the <br /> lake. <br /> Puzak stated they are on Lot 31 and are more than 75 feet from the property. Puzak stated SP Testing <br /> did find two septic sites. Puzak indicated he would be willing to connect up to City sewer when it <br /> becomes available. <br /> Lindquist inquired whether those two other lots are considered buildable. <br /> Puzak stated the property owner of those two lots would like to rezone the property to multi-family <br /> and build townhomes on those lots. Puzak stated he is not interested in subsidizing sewer to those two <br /> lots and would like to wait until that property owner connects to City sewer. <br /> Gaffron stated the City would like to see these properties connected to City sewer if at all possible. <br /> Mabusth inquired whether the City has a copy of the lease giving the Applicant the right to have septic <br /> on Lot 31. <br /> Gaffron stated there are copies of that document in the file. <br /> Puzak stated it is actually an easement that he owns. <br /> Stoddard stated in his opinion structural coverage should be limited to 15 percent. Stoddard requested <br /> the building pad be illustrated on the survey. <br /> Rahn inquired why both septic sites are on the adjoining property. <br /> Puzak stated he has a deeded easement over the adjoining property for septic purposes. Puzak stated <br /> he would prefer Option 1 under Staff's recommendations. Puzak stated he is not requesting a building <br /> permit at this time but is requesting variances to proceed forward with construction of a new house. <br /> Hawn noted the adjoining property could not be built on since it has a deeded easement over it. <br /> Puzak stated the old foundation would be entirely removed. Puzak indicated he would like to <br /> construct a new residence in order to accommodate his larger family. <br /> Hawn inquired if Lot 31 is included in the total area,what impact that would have on the hardcover <br /> numbers. <br /> PAGE 21 <br />