My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-20-2001 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
08-20-2001 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 2:23:16 PM
Creation date
2/27/2012 2:23:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> August 20,2001 <br /> (Boat Storage,Continued) <br /> Hawn inquired about Item F. <br /> It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to require that boats not block lake views enjoyed by <br /> adjacent neighbors. <br /> Lindquist inquired about lakeshore lots. <br /> Mabusth stated there are some developments on Casco Point that have tracks where the boats are <br /> brought up out of the lake and stored on the lakeshore side of the yard. Mabusth inquired whether that <br /> should be allowed. <br /> Kluth stated if the first part of the language is stricken, it would make more sense,with the second half <br /> remaining the same. Kluth stated boats stored on the lakeshore side of the residence cannot block the <br /> adjoining property owner's view of the lake. <br /> Smith inquired what effect driving a boat in and out during the summer has on the degradation of the <br /> lake and lakeshore, if any. <br /> Lindquist stated that does not need to be addressed in this ordinance. <br /> Kluth stated if you routinely drive your boat in and out in the same place, it could raise issues of <br /> hardcover. <br /> Smith inquired whether the Planning Commission was considering boats in the 0-75 foot setback. <br /> Lindquist stated boats in the 0-75 foot setback are not allowed. Lindquist stated if the track already <br /> exists,that is fine, but a new track cannot be installed. <br /> Smith inquired whether boats could be stored in the 0-75 foot setback regardless if there is a track there <br /> or not. <br /> Lindquist stated in some cases they could. <br /> Hawn stated language could stated in his view it does affect the lakeshore. <br /> Hawn stated every time you remove a boat from the lake your vehicle would need to be down there. <br /> Lindquist stated he is in agreement with Kluth that boats should not be stored where they will block <br /> adjoining property owner's view of the lake. <br /> Smith suggested the language, and boats shall not be stored in the 0-75 foot area. <br /> Lindquist stated then the Planning Commission is better off leaving Item G as is. <br /> PAGE 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.