Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 28, 2011 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> Page 15 of 24 <br /> <br />(7. OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD RECONSTRUCTION, Continued) <br /> <br />Rahn moved, Franchot seconded, to make the previous motion approving the alternate bids the <br />prevailing motion over Printup's motion eliminating all landscaping. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, <br />Printup opposed. <br /> <br /> <br />MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT <br /> <br />This item follows Item No. 16. <br /> <br /> <br />CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br /> <br />8. CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SPEED BUMPS <br /> <br />Loftus stated in July of 2010, the City of Orono hosted a neighborhood meeting to address the traffic <br />concerns received from residents along Crystal Bay Road. In October of 2010, the residents submitted a <br />petition for installation of a cul-de-sac or barrier at one end of the roadway or the other. At the <br />October 11th meeting, the Orono City Council discussed the petition. The general consensus was not to <br />incur the expense of proceeding with the requested cul-de-sac or barrier. Instead, the City Council <br />suggested a task force look at other options to address the traffic concerns from residents along Crystal <br />Bay Road. <br /> <br />In February of this year, the task force met and asked Staff to bring speed bump information to the City <br />Council for consideration. <br /> <br />A temporary speed bump, which is one foot wide by one and a half inches high, would cost $4,000 plus <br />periodic replacement. A permanent or temporary speed hump, which is a gradual rise in the pavement <br />approximately 12 feet wide and three to four inches high, would also cost approximately $4,000. <br /> <br />In addition, a 24-inch sign would be used at each of the four bump locations to give warning of a vertical <br />deflection in the roadway. There would also be yellow striping on the bump itself to increase visibility <br />and safety. <br /> <br />This expenditure is not funded in the 2011 budget. The City Council may want to consider how to handle <br />additional or future requests for speed bumps. Plymouth requires a phased approach with education and <br />enforcement followed by a petition supported by 75 percent of properties. Properties abutting the <br />improvement are specially assessed a portion of the cost. Wayzata requires a petition supported by at <br />least 50 percent of properties for installation or removal of speed bumps. <br /> <br />Loftus displayed a picture of a temporary speed bump and a speed hump. <br /> <br />McMillan asked how many bumps there would be. <br /> <br />Loftus indicated there are typically five speed bumps in a series. <br /> <br />Don DeBaere, Orono Public Works, indicated there would be three humps. <br /> <br />Mayor McMillan opened the meeting to resident comments at 8:42 pm. <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 04/11/2011 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 03/28/2011 <br />[Page 15 of 24]