My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-28-2011 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
03-28-2011 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 11:21:41 AM
Creation date
2/24/2012 10:10:45 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
356
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 14, 2011 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 13 of 22 <br /> <br />(10. OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD RECONSTRUCTION UPDATE, Continued) <br /> <br />Kellogg stated the City Council will need to make a decision on the irrigation system for the median <br />landscaping and the railing. The estimated cost for the irrigation system is approximately $32,000. The <br />estimated cost to have the contractor provide ongoing maintenance during the two to three year <br />establishment period is $15,000 to $20,000. It is the recommendation of the Public Works Department to <br />install the irrigation system to minimize Public Works' oversight and possible lapses in maintenance. <br /> <br />McMillan asked whether the School District is in agreement with maintaining what is being proposed. <br /> <br />Kellogg indicated in his view the School District was very receptive to the plan. <br /> <br />Bremer asked what the purpose of the meeting is on March 28th. <br /> <br />Loftus noted the City has not met with the School Board since last October and that the final plans will be <br />reviewed at the joint meeting. Staff has not received comments on the maintenance agreement yet, which <br />may also be discussed. <br /> <br />Mattick stated the School Board has been presented with the maintenance agreement and that they have <br />indicated they would like to take a closer look at it and will be providing their comments. <br /> <br />Bremer asked what the City Council needs to do tonight. <br /> <br />Kellogg stated they would like direction on the landscaping and irrigation system as well as the railing. <br />The plans need to be submitted to state aid within the next two weeks if they are to stay on schedule. <br /> <br />Printup asked what the cost is for lighting and whether that was an oversight. <br /> <br />Kellogg noted the cost for the lighting is estimated at $253,000 and that the cost identified in the <br />feasibility study was $320,000, which is considerably under what was initially estimated. <br /> <br />McMillan asked how high the contingency can go in the event they want to add additional landscaping <br />after the project is completed. <br /> <br />Kellogg stated the project is awarded based on the low bid and that the plant materials would be identified <br />individually. The City is not obligated to plant that many if they find there are cost overruns. <br /> <br />McMillan commented she would like a contingency included in the event they want to add another tree or <br />additional plants. <br /> <br />Kellogg pointed out the landscaping will be one of the last things to be completed, and if the costs for the <br />project are higher than anticipated, the City does have the ability to reduce the amount of landscaping at <br />that time. <br /> <br />Bremer asked what meeting is being held this week. <br /> <br />Loftus stated the chairman of the School Board and grounds supervisor has asked for an opportunity to <br />meet about the maintenance agreement. <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 03/28/2011 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 03/14/2011[Page 13 of 22]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.