My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-28-2011 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
03-28-2011 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 11:21:41 AM
Creation date
2/24/2012 10:10:45 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
356
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 14, 2011 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 12 of 22 <br /> <br />(10. OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD RECONSTRUCTION UPDATE, Continued) <br /> <br />Kellogg noted the color rendering of the plant types depicts a low mow fescue that was being proposed. <br />One of the School District’s concerns with the low mow fescue was that it would become a trash collector <br />and that they would prefer a different seed mix. The School District’s intent is to mow the median every <br />week or two weeks. <br /> <br />Slack illustrated the proposed road layout and landscaping plan. The plan had originally depicted three <br />different options for landscaping in the roundabout areas. They are now recommending trees in the <br />middle of the roundabout with shrubs around the base. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if there would be grass on the roundabout. <br /> <br />Slack indicated there would be grass on the roundabouts and that the School District would also be <br />maintaining those areas. <br /> <br />Kellogg pointed out the area of the grass on the roundabout. <br /> <br />Slack displayed various plants that would be best suited for this type of environment. <br /> <br />McMillan asked how high the railing would be and what materials it would consist of. <br /> <br />Slack stated they are estimating the railing at between 32 to 36 inches tall, which will require some effort <br />to get over. The median would be wide enough to stop someone from falling out into the lane of traffic if <br />the person should trip over the railing. The post could either be wood and painted or metal. Currently the <br />proposal is for metal posts and wire cord. <br /> <br />McMillan asked what would stop people from going around the railing. <br /> <br />Slack indicated they are proposing to create a 3:1 slope from the back of the curb and provide a flat top <br />area on top for plantings. Slack noted that would not stop people completely from going around the <br />railing or over the landscaping, but it would be a deterrent. Based on the design and the cost of the <br />landscaping, they are looking at massing the shrubs, which will provide an almost immediate barrier. <br />Slack noted since it is landscaping, it will not prevent someone from crossing at that location if they so <br />choose. The intent of the design is to change people’s perception of where they can cross. <br /> <br />Slack noted the costs for the landscaping have remained basically the same following the revisions. If the <br />railing were removed, they would plant additional trees and shrubs, which would result in an $8,000 <br />savings overall. <br /> <br />Kellogg pointed out the Council’s packet include two cost estimates. Based on their conversation with <br />the School District, two additional trees were added to the cost estimate. <br /> <br />Slack noted there is a 10 percent contingency also included in the estimates and that the estimates are a <br />little high based on what he is currently seeing in the market. The railing will probably help deter people <br />more so than the shrubs. The purpose of the railing and landscaping is to focus pedestrians to the <br />designated crosswalks. <br /> <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 03/28/2011 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 03/14/2011[Page 12 of 22]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.