My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-14-2011 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
02-14-2011 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 11:17:08 AM
Creation date
2/24/2012 10:10:20 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />Monday, January 24, 2011 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 12 of 15 <br /> <br />(8. OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PLAN UPDATE, Continued) <br /> <br />McMillan stated the median could be four feet wide at those points and have some type of stamped <br />concrete or other treatment. <br /> <br />Franchot commented that the main concern the Council has heard from the beginning of this project is <br />pedestrians crossing the roadway at undesirable locations and the safety hazard that would create. <br />Franchot stated having a four foot median with nothing in it would not address the safety issue. <br /> <br />McMillan commented that people could also walk across landscaping and that it really is not a deterrent. <br /> <br />Franchot pointed out there would also be fencing in some locations where pedestrian traffic is likely to <br />occur. Franchot stated he would like to know exactly what Mayor McMillan is proposing. <br /> <br />McMillan stated the fencing is one option but that she would like to see wider, identified crosswalks and <br />promote crossing at those areas. McMillan stated it is doubtful the City would be able to stop pedestrians <br />from crossing at other points even if they spent hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to deter that. <br /> <br />Franchot asked if the City Council approves the narrower median and the wider crosswalks, how they <br />would encourage people to use only those designated areas to cross the roadway. <br /> <br />Slack indicated there would need to be an educational component to that and the school would play a role <br />in that. Slack stated there could also be additional policing of the area and the possibility of tickets being <br />issued for those who do not cross at the proper location. <br /> <br />Franchot pointed out the costs associated with signage and lights are also substantial. <br /> <br />Slack stated he is not familiar with the amount of pedestrian traffic that is experienced on this roadway <br />but that in his estimation it would be substantial based on the fact that the schools are located on this road <br />and the students need to access the different parking lots and recreational fields. Slack stated even if <br />landscaping and land structures are added, that likely will not deter all pedestrian traffic. <br /> <br />McMillan stated short of having a special council meeting where they could look at another alternative, <br />given the time schedule for this project, the Council will need to make a decision tonight. <br /> <br />Franchot moved, Bremer seconded, to authorize the City Engineer to proceed forward with the <br />median/landscaping plan that has been presented tonight, with 50 percent of the boulevard trees <br />being eliminated. VOTE: Ayes 2, Nays 2, McMillan and Printup Opposed. MOTION FAILED. <br /> <br />Bremer commented that this is a time where five council members would be helpful but that a decision <br />needs to be made tonight given the time table and that if Mayor McMillan has a proposal, it should be <br />made tonight. <br /> <br />Printup noted a special council meeting could be held, at which time an alternate plan could be presented <br />depicting the narrower median. <br /> <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 02/14/2011 <br />Approve Council Minutes 01/24/2011 [Page 12 of 15]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.