Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />Monday, January 24, 2011 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 11 of 15 <br /> <br />(8. OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PLAN UPDATE, Continued) <br /> <br />hardcover. Franchot indicated he has attempted to understand Mayor McMillan’s concerns, but that in his <br />view a narrower median will not be attractive. <br /> <br />McMillan stated her two main concerns deal with the maintenance of the median and landscaping and the <br />width of the roadway. McMillan pointed out the roundabouts would have landscaping on them and that <br />landscaping may add more visual obstacles. <br /> <br />Franchot indicated he would be agreeable to the City committing to maintain the landscaping. <br /> <br />Slack stated typically a maintenance plan is developed outlining the various costs. Slack indicated he <br />could provide that to the City tomorrow if they would like to see that. <br /> <br />Printup indicated he would like to see an alternative to what has been proposed tonight and that he <br />personally would like to visualize the alternative as well prior to approving any plan tonight. <br /> <br />Bremer commented it was her understanding that the Council needed to reach a decision on this item <br />tonight, and asked what the deadline is if the City is going to meet their deadline of having the road <br />completed before school starts in the fall. <br /> <br />Kellogg indicated they are approximately two weeks behind the schedule outlined in the feasibility study <br />and that they had hoped to have the Watershed District’s approval by today. Bids are anticipated to be <br />opened May 9th and construction on the roadway would start immediately after school is finished. <br />Kellogg stated the preliminary design was anticipated to be complete in January, followed by completion <br />of the permitting in February. <br /> <br />Printup indicated he is not comfortable approving the landscaping and median tonight and that he would <br />like to see a plan with the narrower median. <br /> <br />Kempf commented that the discussion tonight appears to be largely driven by costs, and that if the <br />purpose of the median is to control pedestrian traffic, without landscaping, the Council is possibly looking <br />at cable railing at $80 to $90 a lineal foot. When those two are weighed against each other, it does not <br />appear the City would be saving any short-term money by eliminating the landscaping. <br /> <br />Kellogg stated they recently received a bid of $60 per lineal foot for the cable railing. <br /> <br />McMillan commented she is also unsure whether the landscaping would deter pedestrian traffic and that <br />there are also long-term maintenance costs associated with the railing. <br /> <br />Franchot asked what McMillan would propose for the median. <br /> <br />McMillan stated she would make the medians at the crosswalks wider. <br /> <br />Franchot asked what the narrow points would look like. <br /> <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 02/14/2011 <br />Approve Council Minutes 01/24/2011 [Page 11 of 15]