My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-08-2010 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
03-08-2010 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2019 10:00:06 AM
Creation date
2/24/2012 10:04:15 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
209
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 22, 2010 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_________________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 9 of 19 <br /> <br />(4. #10-3442 THE EMILY PROGRAM, 2180 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, Continued) <br /> <br />Maddie indicated he did go to the National Eating Disorders website in an attempt to learn more about this <br />disorder. Maddie stated he would like to take a middle ground on this application and try to figure out what <br />further information is needed in order to determine what is best for The Emily Program, the community, and <br />the residents of this neighborhood. <br /> <br />Maddie noted the majority of the local residents oppose the proposed location. Some of the rationale for <br />opposing it include, one, operating a 24/7 facility will change the character and identity of the Crystal Bay <br />neighborhood; two, constant emergency calls at the facility will have an impact on the children‟s perspective <br />of safety in the neighborhood; and three, in terms of safety and risk concerns, the facility will be a non-locked <br />down facility. Maddie asked if it is feasible to presume that someone with suicidal thoughts who flees the <br />facility will pose a clear and present risk. <br /> <br />Murphy noted an addendum to that statement would be, a clear and present risk to whom. <br /> <br />Maddie indicated he presumes the person would be a risk to himself. As it relates to traffic and parking, <br />based on the research that he has done, all logical indications point to the fact that it is likely traffic will <br />increase on the weekends, which is when most people will be home. Maddie noted he did speak to some real <br />estate agents who seem to think that property valuations could potentially be negatively impacted but they are <br />unable to quantify that. <br /> <br />Maddie stated as it relates to due diligence on complaints against the facility, the residents were told by Dr. <br />Miller that he was aware of no complaints against the building. The neighbors feel that additional objective <br />research should be done. The residents to date have been told that it is the City‟s feeling that this use will <br />result in reduced traffic for the neighborhood and that the City should get behind this program because there is <br />nothing not to like about it. <br /> <br />In order to obtain an understanding of where people stand on this application, a straw poll was conducted. The <br />majority of the people in the area are opposed to the proposed location. The French Creek Association does <br />not support the location of the facility. Maddie noted not every resident in this area has been canvassed, but <br />that 76 percent of the immediate residents have been. Of those people, 97 percent of the people are opposed to <br />the location. Maddie commented that the voice of the community is against this location. <br /> <br />In terms of the Emily Program itself, Maddie stated in his opinion there is not a person in this room who does <br />not support the program or its charter. The Emily Program has made a positive impact on people‟s lives and it <br />is an exceptional program, which is not at debate tonight. Maddie stated the question tonight is whether this is <br />the right location for this facility. <br /> <br />Maddie displayed an illustration of the Chaska location on the overhead and pointed out that the area consists <br />of a residential area and a mixed use area. In addition, there is a townhouse complex in the area. <br /> <br />Murphy noted the facility in Chaska is in the process of closing. <br /> <br />Maddie stated the data shows that the program is exceptional. In order to deal with one of the safety and risk <br />concerns raised by the residents, he did look at police records from the Chaska Police Department and the St. <br />Paul Police Department to understand how many calls have been placed to the facilities. The majority of the <br />calls were made to the Chaska facility and a few calls were made to the St. Paul location. There were 12 <br />missing person‟s reports, 11 death/suicide in progress or attempts, seven mental health concerns, and six <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 03/08/2010 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 02/22/2010 <br />[Page 9 of 19]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.